PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CUZ vs. NFLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CUZ vs. NFLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CUZ vs. NFLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated
-11.36%-12.14%32.57%4.33%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
3.21%1.66%66.37%3.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CUZ achieves a -11.36% return, which is significantly lower than NFLY's 3.21% return.


CUZ

1D
3.58%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-11.36%
6M
-20.15%
1Y
-19.95%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
-4.64%
10Y*
0.02%

NFLY

1D
1.57%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
3.21%
6M
-16.09%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CUZ vs. NFLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CUZ
CUZ Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLY
NFLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NFLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CUZ vs. NFLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) and YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CUZNFLYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

0.07

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.89

0.31

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.04

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

0.05

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.64

0.10

-1.74

CUZ vs. NFLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CUZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the NFLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CUZ and NFLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CUZNFLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

0.07

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.89

-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between CUZ and NFLY is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CUZ vs. NFLY - Dividend Comparison

CUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than NFLY's 60.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated
5.67%4.97%4.18%5.26%5.02%2.31%4.45%2.74%2.47%3.24%27.10%3.39%
NFLY
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
60.91%61.53%49.91%11.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CUZ vs. NFLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CUZ drawdown since its inception was -82.87%, which is greater than NFLY's maximum drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CUZ and NFLY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CUZNFLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.87%

-37.18%

-45.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.66%

-37.18%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.19%

-23.36%

-38.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.34%

-7.37%

-27.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.21%

17.46%

-5.25%

Volatility

CUZ vs. NFLY - Volatility Comparison

Cousins Properties Incorporated (CUZ) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF (NFLY) at 4.66%. This indicates that CUZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CUZNFLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

4.66%

+5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.81%

22.24%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.50%

28.94%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.80%

28.39%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.03%

28.39%

+1.64%