CURE vs. GUSH

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%) while GUSH tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CURE returned 13.49%/yr vs -36.52%/yr for GUSH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.

Performance

CURE vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 61.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed GUSH with an annualized return of 13.49%, while GUSH has yielded a comparatively lower -36.52% annualized return.

CURE

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 13.53%
• YTD: -7.96%
• 6M: -6.00%
• 1Y: 26.46%
• 3Y*: 3.05%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: 13.49%

GUSH

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -5.00%
• YTD: 61.19%
• 6M: 49.15%
• 1Y: 49.53%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: -36.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares	-7.96%	22.55%	-8.47%	-9.40%	-20.51%	88.30%	5.02%	55.66%	2.82%	69.32%
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	61.19%	-19.39%	-12.73%	-7.23%	66.47%	129.94%	-97.38%	-52.68%	-74.28%	-40.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE and GUSH is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.27

The correlation between CURE and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CURE vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CURE	GUSH
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	2.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	97.2%
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CURE vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE

CURE Risk / Return Rank: 21
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

GUSH

GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 31
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 28
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CURE	GUSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.89	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	1.40	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.17	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	1.72	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.94	3.77	-1.84

CURE vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CURE vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and GUSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CURE	GUSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.19%	-99.98%	+30.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.10%	-28.94%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.93%	-63.59%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.23%	-73.64%	+21.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.19%	-99.94%	+30.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.94%	-99.80%	+72.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.16%	-92.90%	+74.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.71%	13.16%	+0.55%

Volatility

CURE vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) is 14.30%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a volatility of 18.07%. This indicates that CURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CURE	GUSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.30%	18.07%	-3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.87%	44.41%	-13.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.32%	56.06%	-11.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.84%	68.35%	-24.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.59%	93.58%	-43.99%

CURE vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CURE vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than GUSH's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares	1.16%	1.12%	1.17%	2.02%	0.38%	0.02%	0.17%	0.40%	0.70%	0.18%	0.00%
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares	1.55%	2.60%	2.96%	3.00%	0.47%	0.00%	0.20%	1.68%	0.17%	0.00%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CURE and GUSH in my portfolio?

CURE and GUSH have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CURE or GUSH?

GUSH has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to CURE (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

Which ETF is better, CURE or GUSH?

On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 13.49% vs -36.52% for GUSH. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CURE has been the lower-risk option at 14.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CURE or GUSH?

Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 13.49% return vs -36.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CURE or GUSH?

CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CURE or GUSH?

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.16% for CURE.

What is the main difference between CURE and GUSH?

CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 1.17% for GUSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.