CURE vs. CWEB
CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%) while CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CURE returned 0.03%/yr vs -44.79%/yr for CWEB. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CWEB.
Performance
CURE vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -13.71% return, which is significantly higher than CWEB's -49.71% return.
CURE
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- -13.71%
- 6M
- -14.70%
- 1Y
- 30.81%
- 3Y*
- 0.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
CWEB
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -14.35%
- YTD
- -49.71%
- 6M
- -51.73%
- 1Y
- -44.54%
- 3Y*
- -14.65%
- 5Y*
- -44.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CURE vs. CWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -13.71% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | -20.51% | 88.30% | 5.02% | 55.66% | 2.82% | 69.32% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -49.71% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURE and CWEB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CURE and CWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CURE vs. CWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CURE
CWEB
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
CURE
CWEB
Basic Materials
CURE
-
CWEB
-
Communication Services
CURE
-
CWEB
Consumer Cyclical
CURE
-
CWEB
Consumer Defensive
CURE
-
CWEB
Energy
CURE
-
CWEB
-
Financial Services
CURE
-
CWEB
Industrials
CURE
-
CWEB
-
Real Estate
CURE
-
CWEB
Technology
CURE
-
CWEB
Utilities
CURE
-
CWEB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURE vs. CWEB — Risk / Return Rank
CURE
CWEB
CURE vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CURE | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.87 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.68 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | -1.29 | +3.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CURE vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and CWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURE | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -98.09% | +28.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.10% | -65.54% | +34.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -65.54% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.23% | -95.63% | +43.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.51% | -97.95% | +66.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -65.63% | +47.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.94% | 34.57% | -20.63% |
Volatility
CURE vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) is 15.11%, while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that CURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURE | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.11% | 16.25% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.86% | 40.73% | -9.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 54.19% | -9.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.89% | 94.56% | -50.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.63% | 80.55% | -30.92% |
CURE vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CURE vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison
CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than CWEB's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.24% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.71% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CURE and CWEB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to CURE (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs CWEB's -98.09%.
On 5-year performance, CURE leads with 0.03% vs -44.79% for CWEB. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CURE has been the lower-risk option at 15.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CURE has performed better with a 0.03% return vs -44.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 1.24% for CURE.
CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 1.30% for CWEB.
CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.70 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CURE and CWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer