PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CURE vs. RXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CURE vs. RXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than RXL's -5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed RXL with an annualized return of 14.03%, while RXL has yielded a comparatively lower 13.05% annualized return.


CURE

1D
3.78%
1M
4.14%
YTD
-10.45%
6M
-10.93%
1Y
35.07%
3Y*
1.46%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
14.03%

RXL

1D
2.50%
1M
3.01%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-5.67%
1Y
26.56%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURE vs. RXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
-10.45%22.55%-8.47%-9.40%-20.51%88.30%5.02%55.66%2.82%69.32%
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
-5.37%19.76%-2.72%-3.15%-15.26%48.06%19.24%40.40%3.38%46.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CURE and RXL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011

0.97

The correlation between CURE and RXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

CURE vs. RXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CURE
RXL

Healthcare

100.0%
77.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

12.2%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

CURE
100.0%
RXL
77.2%

Basic Materials

CURE

-

RXL

-

Communication Services

CURE

-

RXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

CURE

-

RXL

-

Consumer Defensive

CURE

-

RXL

-

Energy

CURE

-

RXL

-

Financial Services

CURE

-

RXL
12.2%

Industrials

CURE

-

RXL

-

Real Estate

CURE

-

RXL

-

Technology

CURE

-

RXL

-

Utilities

CURE

-

RXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CURE vs. RXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURE
CURE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CURE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CURE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

RXL
RXL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
RXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RXL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RXL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURE vs. RXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CURERXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.25

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

2.85

-0.34

CURE vs. RXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the RXL Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURE and RXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CURE vs. RXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, roughly equal to the maximum RXL drawdown of -67.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and RXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CURERXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.19%

-67.70%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.10%

-21.33%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.93%

-36.08%

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.23%

-36.08%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

-51.00%

-18.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.92%

-14.00%

-14.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-15.85%

-2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.98%

9.33%

+4.65%

Volatility

CURE vs. RXL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) at 10.70%. This indicates that CURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CURERXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.41%

10.70%

+4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.09%

21.46%

+9.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.49%

30.42%

+14.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.92%

29.76%

+14.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.58%

33.28%

+16.30%

CURE vs. RXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than RXL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CURE vs. RXL - Dividend Comparison

CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than RXL's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CURE
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares
1.19%1.12%1.17%2.02%0.38%0.02%0.17%0.40%0.70%0.18%0.00%0.00%
RXL
ProShares Ultra Health Care
1.54%1.43%1.22%0.18%0.32%0.10%0.15%0.27%0.32%0.11%0.12%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, CURE and RXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CURE has higher volatility (15.41%) compared to RXL (10.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs RXL's -67.70%.

On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 14.03% vs 13.05% for RXL. On fees, RXL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RXL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.

RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 1.19% for CURE.

CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 0.95% for RXL.

RXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CURE and RXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer