CURE vs. RXL
CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and RXL (ProShares Ultra Health Care) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%) while RXL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CURE returned 14.03%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for RXL. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RXL.
Performance
CURE vs. RXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -10.45% return, which is significantly lower than RXL's -5.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed RXL with an annualized return of 14.03%, while RXL has yielded a comparatively lower 13.05% annualized return.
CURE
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- 35.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
RXL
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -5.67%
- 1Y
- 26.56%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.95%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
CURE vs. RXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -10.45% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | -20.51% | 88.30% | 5.02% | 55.66% | 2.82% | 69.32% |
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | -5.37% | 19.76% | -2.72% | -3.15% | -15.26% | 48.06% | 19.24% | 40.40% | 3.38% | 46.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURE and RXL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011 | 0.97 |
The correlation between CURE and RXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
CURE vs. RXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CURE
RXL
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
CURE
RXL
Basic Materials
CURE
-
RXL
-
Communication Services
CURE
-
RXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
CURE
-
RXL
-
Consumer Defensive
CURE
-
RXL
-
Energy
CURE
-
RXL
-
Financial Services
CURE
-
RXL
Industrials
CURE
-
RXL
-
Real Estate
CURE
-
RXL
-
Technology
CURE
-
RXL
-
Utilities
CURE
-
RXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURE vs. RXL — Risk / Return Rank
CURE
RXL
CURE vs. RXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CURE | RXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 2.85 | -0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CURE vs. RXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, roughly equal to the maximum RXL drawdown of -67.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and RXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURE | RXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -67.70% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.10% | -21.33% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -36.08% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.23% | -36.08% | -16.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -51.00% | -18.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.92% | -14.00% | -14.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.18% | -15.85% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.98% | 9.33% | +4.65% |
Volatility
CURE vs. RXL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) has a higher volatility of 15.41% compared to ProShares Ultra Health Care (RXL) at 10.70%. This indicates that CURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURE | RXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.41% | 10.70% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.09% | 21.46% | +9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.49% | 30.42% | +14.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 29.76% | +14.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 33.28% | +16.30% |
CURE vs. RXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than RXL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CURE vs. RXL - Dividend Comparison
CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than RXL's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.19% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXL ProShares Ultra Health Care | 1.54% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.18% | 0.32% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, CURE and RXL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CURE has higher volatility (15.41%) compared to RXL (10.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs RXL's -67.70%.
On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 14.03% vs 13.05% for RXL. On fees, RXL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RXL has been the lower-risk option at 10.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RXL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CURE.
RXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 1.19% for CURE.
CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while RXL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 0.95% for RXL.
RXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CURE and RXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer