CURE vs. EDC
CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and EDC (Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%) while EDC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CURE returned 13.49%/yr vs 8.38%/yr for EDC. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for EDC.
Performance
CURE vs. EDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly lower than EDC's 62.45% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed EDC with an annualized return of 13.49%, while EDC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.38% annualized return.
CURE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- -7.96%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
EDC
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 62.45%
- 6M
- 72.90%
- 1Y
- 137.10%
- 3Y*
- 43.12%
- 5Y*
- -2.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.38%
CURE vs. EDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -7.96% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | -20.51% | 88.30% | 5.02% | 55.66% | 2.82% | 69.32% |
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 62.45% | 94.58% | -2.00% | 7.48% | -60.25% | -20.81% | 6.49% | 43.92% | -49.87% | 138.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURE and EDC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CURE and EDC has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CURE vs. EDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CURE
EDC
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
CURE
EDC
Basic Materials
CURE
-
EDC
Communication Services
CURE
-
EDC
Consumer Cyclical
CURE
-
EDC
Consumer Defensive
CURE
-
EDC
Energy
CURE
-
EDC
Financial Services
CURE
-
EDC
Industrials
CURE
-
EDC
Real Estate
CURE
-
EDC
Technology
CURE
-
EDC
Utilities
CURE
-
EDC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURE vs. EDC — Risk / Return Rank
CURE
EDC
CURE vs. EDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CURE | EDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 3.63 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 12.25 | -10.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CURE vs. EDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum EDC drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and EDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURE | EDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -92.54% | +23.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.10% | -37.98% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -49.48% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.23% | -80.70% | +28.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -87.01% | +17.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.94% | -65.52% | +38.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -65.35% | +47.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.71% | 11.25% | +2.46% |
Volatility
CURE vs. EDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) is 14.30%, while Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares (EDC) has a volatility of 33.39%. This indicates that CURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURE | EDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.30% | 33.39% | -19.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 58.40% | -27.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.32% | 64.72% | -20.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.84% | 57.74% | -13.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.59% | 61.12% | -11.53% |
CURE vs. EDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EDC's 1.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CURE vs. EDC - Dividend Comparison
CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than EDC's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.16% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% |
EDC Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares | 1.05% | 1.79% | 3.94% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 0.97% | 0.78% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CURE and EDC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDC has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to CURE (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs EDC's -92.54%.
On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 13.49% vs 8.38% for EDC. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CURE has been the lower-risk option at 14.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 13.49% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for EDC.
CURE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.05% for EDC.
CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while EDC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 1.33% for EDC.
EDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CURE and EDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer