CTEX vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
CTEX and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CTEX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2021. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both CTEX and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CTEX vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTEX vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | -2.49% | 67.74% | -20.38% | -10.25% | -20.38% | -6.68% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 22.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return.
CTEX
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 101.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CTEX vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CTEX vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
CTEX
QLD
CTEX vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 0.84 | +1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 1.43 | +1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 1.49 | +3.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.16 | 4.88 | +8.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 0.84 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.53 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEX and QLD is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CTEX vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 2.15% | 2.17% | 0.57% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
CTEX vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.31% | -83.13% | +12.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.62% | -25.13% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.12% | -20.10% | -11.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -18.30% | -24.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.52% | 7.67% | -0.15% |
Volatility
CTEX vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) have volatilities of 12.49% and 12.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTEX | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.49% | 12.96% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.71% | 25.55% | +8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.74% | 44.91% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.17% | 44.77% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.17% | 44.47% | -1.30% |