CTEX vs. PBW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - CTEX tracks the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index while PBW tracks the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CTEX returned 6.98%/yr vs -3.13%/yr for PBW. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CTEX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PBW.

Performance

CTEX vs. PBW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 3.93% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's 14.20% return.

CTEX

• 1D: 4.47%
• 1M: -8.98%
• 6M: -9.23%
• YTD: 3.93%
• 1Y: 55.68%
• 3Y*: 6.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.58%

PBW

• 1D: 5.03%
• 1M: -5.30%
• 6M: 0.42%
• YTD: 14.20%
• 1Y: 53.31%
• 3Y*: -3.13%
• 5Y*: -14.01%
• 10Y*: 7.79%
• ALL TIME*: -2.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	$38.10K	$30.94K	$62.73K
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	$38.06M	$31.70M	$36.29M

CTEX vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	3.93%	67.74%	-20.38%	-10.25%	-20.38%	-6.68%
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	14.20%	53.96%	-30.77%	-20.03%	-44.55%	-6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and PBW is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021	0.92

The correlation between CTEX and PBW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CTEX vs. PBW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CTEX	PBW
Industrials	45.1%	25.7%
Technology	38.1%	23.6%
Utilities	11.9%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	15.3%
Energy	2.3%	3.9%
Basic Materials	-	16.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	2.1%
Financial Services	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CTEX vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CTEX

CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 39
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

PBW

PBW Risk / Return Rank: 40
PBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PBW Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PBW Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CTEX vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEX	PBW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.21	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.73	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.48	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	4.43	-0.02

CTEX vs. PBW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PBW Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and PBW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and PBW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEX	PBW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.31%	-89.02%	+18.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.09%	-36.09%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-50.47%	-65.32%	+14.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-84.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.78%	-71.22%	+42.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.26%	-62.95%	+21.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.67%	12.07%	+0.60%

Volatility

CTEX vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 16.45% compared to Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) at 15.55%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEX	PBW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.45%	15.55%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.77%	33.71%	+2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.12%	44.39%	+2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.91%	43.70%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.91%	39.30%	+4.61%

CTEX vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEX vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than PBW's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	2.01%	2.17%	0.57%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	1.36%	0.79%	2.84%	3.68%	4.21%	1.71%	0.44%	1.45%	2.04%	1.28%	2.68%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEX and PBW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CTEX and PBW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CTEX or PBW?

CTEX has higher volatility (16.45%) compared to PBW (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs PBW's -89.02%.

Which ETF is better, CTEX or PBW?

On 3-year performance, CTEX leads with 6.98% vs -3.13% for PBW. On fees, CTEX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PBW has been the lower-risk option at 15.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEX or PBW?

Over the 3-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 6.98% return vs -3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEX or PBW?

CTEX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEX or PBW?

CTEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.36% for PBW.

What is the main difference between CTEX and PBW?

CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.61% for PBW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.