CTEX vs. TINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while TINT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CTEX returned 11.07%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for TINT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.58% expense ratio.

Performance

CTEX vs. TINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly higher than TINT's 19.21% return.

CTEX

• 1D: -6.36%
• 1M: -8.02%
• YTD: 20.77%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 116.42%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TINT

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: -2.84%
• YTD: 19.21%
• 6M: 18.70%
• 1Y: 35.71%
• 3Y*: 8.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEX vs. TINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	20.77%	67.74%	-20.38%	-10.25%	-20.38%	-15.84%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	19.21%	16.13%	-13.37%	20.04%	-28.14%	1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and TINT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.64

The correlation between CTEX and TINT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

CTEX vs. TINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CTEX	TINT
Industrials	38.2%	7.0%
Energy	36.3%	-
Utilities	16.5%	-
Technology	6.1%	21.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	67.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.9%
Healthcare	-	0.8%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CTEX vs. TINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEX

CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 45
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEX vs. TINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEX	TINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	1.46	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	2.08	+0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.26	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.35	2.05	+3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	7.29	+6.40

CTEX vs. TINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is higher than the TINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and TINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. TINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, which is greater than TINT's maximum drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and TINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEX	TINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.31%	-41.36%	-28.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.90%	-17.53%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.83%	-30.42%	-26.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.23%	-6.73%	-10.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.61%	-20.92%	-20.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.53%	4.91%	+3.62%

Volatility

CTEX vs. TINT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) at 8.83%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEX	TINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.24%	8.83%	+10.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.48%	21.16%	+11.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.17%	24.63%	+19.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.59%	23.58%	+20.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.59%	23.58%	+20.01%

CTEX vs. TINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CTEX and TINT have an expense ratio of 0.58%.

Dividends

CTEX vs. TINT - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than TINT's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	1.73%	2.17%	0.57%	0.12%	0.00%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	1.03%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEX and TINT in my portfolio?

CTEX and TINT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTEX or TINT?

CTEX has higher volatility (19.24%) compared to TINT (8.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs TINT's -41.36%.

Which ETF is better, CTEX or TINT?

On 3-year performance, CTEX leads with 11.07% vs 8.66% for TINT. Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. On volatility, TINT has been the lower-risk option at 8.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEX or TINT?

Over the 3-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEX or TINT?

CTEX and TINT have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEX or TINT?

CTEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.03% for TINT.

What is the main difference between CTEX and TINT?

CTEX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while TINT is Energy Equities. CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.