CSRE vs. RISR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CSRE (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF) and RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSRE is a REIT fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers, while RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CSRE returned 16.49% vs 6.29% for RISR. Their -0.17 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CSRE charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for RISR.

Performance

CSRE vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSRE achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than RISR's 4.75% return.

CSRE

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 13.66%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.47%

RISR

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 4.83%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 1Y: 6.29%
• 3Y*: 10.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	$3.71M	$3.33M	$3.84M
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF	$3.20M	$3.07M	$3.51M

CSRE vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	15.74%	4.30%
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF	4.75%	3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CSRE and RISR is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

CSRE vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CSRE

CSRE Risk / Return Rank: 48
CSRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CSRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CSRE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
CSRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
CSRE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

RISR

RISR Risk / Return Rank: 51
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CSRE vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CSRE	RISR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.20	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.76	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.22	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.42	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.23	5.79	+1.44

CSRE vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSRE and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CSRE vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSRE drawdown since its inception was -13.03%, smaller than the maximum RISR drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSRE and RISR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSRE	RISR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.03%	-14.31%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-2.61%	-5.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-0.15%	-1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.14%	-2.12%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	1.09%	+1.19%

Volatility

CSRE vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.13%. This indicates that CSRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSRE	RISR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	1.13%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.64%	3.57%	+7.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	5.25%	+8.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	11.67%	+3.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	11.67%	+3.81%

CSRE vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSRE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSRE vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

CSRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than RISR's 5.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSRE Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF	2.14%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF	5.88%	5.95%	5.67%	7.96%	4.26%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSRE and RISR in my portfolio?

CSRE and RISR have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSRE or RISR?

CSRE has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to RISR (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSRE dropped -13.03% vs RISR's -14.31%.

Which ETF is better, CSRE or RISR?

On 1-year performance, CSRE leads with 16.49% vs 6.29% for RISR. On fees, CSRE is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSRE or RISR?

Over the 1-year period, CSRE has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSRE or RISR?

CSRE is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSRE or RISR?

RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 2.14% for CSRE.

What is the main difference between CSRE and RISR?

CSRE is categorized as REIT, while RISR is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Cohen & Steers and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for CSRE and 1.13% for RISR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.