BLDG vs. REET
BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) and REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) are both REIT funds. BLDG is actively managed, while REET is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLDG returned 2.94%/yr vs 2.71%/yr for REET. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLDG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for REET.
Performance
BLDG vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 10.82% return.
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- —
REET
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 11.49%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.29%
BLDG vs. REET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 9.06% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.25% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 10.82% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | 18.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDG and REET is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BLDG and REET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDG vs. REET — Risk / Return Rank
BLDG
REET
BLDG vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDG | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.61 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 5.76 | -1.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDG vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum REET drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and REET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDG | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.25% | -44.59% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -9.04% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -18.02% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.25% | -32.11% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -1.42% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -9.75% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.52% | +0.35% |
Volatility
BLDG vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) at 4.30%. This indicates that BLDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDG | REET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 4.30% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 9.37% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 12.52% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.28% | 16.97% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 18.87% | -3.31% |
BLDG vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDG vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than REET's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.39% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.40% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDG and REET have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDG has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to REET (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDG dropped -27.25% vs REET's -44.59%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 2.94% vs 2.71% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 2.94% return vs 2.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 3.40% for REET.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BLDG and 0.14% for REET.
REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLDG and REET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer