PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
BLDG vs. SRET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

BLDG vs. SRET

Last updated May 12, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET).

BLDG and SRET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLDG is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020. SRET is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BLDG or SRET.

Correlation

The correlation between BLDG and SRET is -0.60. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

BLDG vs. SRET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

BLDG:

18.54%

SRET:

8.53%

Max Drawdown

BLDG:

-0.48%

SRET:

-0.59%

Current Drawdown

BLDG:

0.00%

SRET:

0.00%

Returns By Period

BLDG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SRET

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BLDG vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLDG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.

BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLDG vs. SRET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BLDG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLDG is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLDG is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLDG is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLDG is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLDG is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLDG is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
SRET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SRET is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SRET is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SRET is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SRET is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SRET is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SRET is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLDG vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

No data
No data
No data
No data
No data

Loading data...

Dividends

BLDG vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison

BLDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%.

TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF		8.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BLDG vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -0.48%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -0.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and SRET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

BLDG vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...