CSMDX vs. LSSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX).
CSMDX is managed by Copeland Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017. LSSCX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 13, 1991.
Performance
CSMDX vs. LSSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSMDX vs. LSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 1.51% | 2.72% | 2.24% | 18.89% | -14.89% | 22.60% | 8.29% | 29.90% | -5.20% | 10.44% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 0.75% | 5.31% | 10.89% | 19.39% | -11.52% | 29.03% | 2.29% | 25.06% | -16.81% | 7.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSMDX achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than LSSCX's 0.75% return.
CSMDX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 9.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
LSSCX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSMDX vs. LSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LSSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSMDX vs. LSSCX — Risk / Return Rank
CSMDX
LSSCX
CSMDX vs. LSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSMDX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 0.98 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.08 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 0.25 | +1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSMDX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.32 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSMDX and LSSCX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSMDX vs. LSSCX - Dividend Comparison
CSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than LSSCX's 17.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSMDX Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.09% | 3.14% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 4.07% | 6.67% | 0.38% | 2.61% | 4.40% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 17.37% | 17.50% | 10.71% | 20.30% | 12.74% | 19.01% | 8.04% | 8.65% | 17.43% | 12.58% | 8.27% | 11.35% |
Drawdowns
CSMDX vs. LSSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSMDX drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, smaller than the maximum LSSCX drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMDX and LSSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSMDX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.28% | -54.28% | +17.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -14.43% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.60% | -25.10% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.20% | -9.89% | +0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -7.61% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 6.62% | -3.10% |
Volatility
CSMDX vs. LSSCX - Volatility Comparison
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSMDX | LSSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 4.56% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 12.70% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.31% | 24.85% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 20.90% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 22.37% | -3.12% |