PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSSCX vs. LSIOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSCX achieves a 19.98% return, which is significantly higher than LSIOX's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSCX has outperformed LSIOX with an annualized return of 10.27%, while LSIOX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.70% annualized return.


LSSCX

1D
1.52%
1M
5.43%
YTD
19.98%
6M
17.22%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
10.27%

LSIOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.61%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
5.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
19.98%5.31%10.89%19.39%-11.52%29.03%2.29%25.06%-16.81%10.01%
LSIOX
Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund
2.39%9.31%9.95%10.81%-12.85%4.32%9.25%13.01%-2.08%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSCX and LSIOX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2013

0.56

The correlation between LSSCX and LSIOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSSCX vs. LSIOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSSCX
LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

LSIOX
LSIOX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LSIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSSCXLSIOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.66

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

5.27

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

23.46

-11.46

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the LSIOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSCX and LSIOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, which is greater than LSIOX's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSCX and LSIOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSSCXLSIOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.28%

-20.94%

-33.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-1.82%

-8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-4.24%

-20.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-17.13%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.65%

-20.94%

-23.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-2.79%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

0.38%

+2.62%

Volatility

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund (LSIOX) at 0.85%. This indicates that LSSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSIOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSSCXLSIOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

0.85%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

2.24%

+10.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.61%

3.10%

+14.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.92%

5.29%

+15.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

5.71%

+16.72%

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIOX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSSCX vs. LSIOX - Dividend Comparison

LSSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.58%, more than LSIOX's 6.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSIOX
Loomis Sayles High Income Opps Fund
6.75%6.39%7.34%7.31%7.32%9.02%5.58%5.62%7.50%5.64%6.03%6.18%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
14.58%17.50%10.71%20.30%12.74%19.01%8.04%8.65%17.43%12.58%8.27%11.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSSCX and LSIOX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSCX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to LSIOX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSCX dropped -54.28% vs LSIOX's -20.94%.

LSIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSSCX and LSIOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer