LSSCX vs. LSGBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX).
LSSCX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 13, 1991. LSGBX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 9, 1991.
Performance
LSSCX vs. LSGBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSSCX vs. LSGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 0.75% | 5.31% | 10.89% | 19.39% | -11.52% | 29.03% | 2.29% | 25.06% | -16.81% | 10.01% |
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | -1.87% | 8.52% | -2.46% | 5.48% | -17.18% | -4.94% | 13.49% | 7.52% | -2.49% | 8.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSSCX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than LSGBX's -1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSCX has outperformed LSGBX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while LSGBX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.94% annualized return.
LSSCX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 13.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
LSGBX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.89%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- -2.03%
- 10Y*
- 0.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSSCX vs. LSGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGBX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSSCX vs. LSGBX — Risk / Return Rank
LSSCX
LSGBX
LSSCX vs. LSGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSSCX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.83 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.23 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 1.46 | -1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 5.18 | -4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSSCX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.83 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.32 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.16 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.78 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSSCX and LSGBX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LSSCX vs. LSGBX - Dividend Comparison
LSSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.37%, more than LSGBX's 0.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSSCX Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund | 17.37% | 17.50% | 10.71% | 20.30% | 12.74% | 19.01% | 8.04% | 8.65% | 17.43% | 12.58% | 8.27% | 11.35% |
LSGBX Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.31% | 4.94% | 1.75% | 0.66% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LSSCX vs. LSGBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, which is greater than LSGBX's maximum drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSCX and LSGBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSSCX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.28% | -26.86% | -27.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | -4.05% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -25.41% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.65% | -26.86% | -17.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -13.99% | +4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -4.76% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 1.14% | +5.48% |
Volatility
LSSCX vs. LSGBX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Loomis Sayles Global Bond Fund (LSGBX) at 1.83%. This indicates that LSSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSSCX | LSGBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 1.83% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 3.70% | +9.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.85% | 6.24% | +18.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 6.59% | +14.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 5.79% | +16.58% |