PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSSCX vs. LSFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSCX achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly higher than LSFIX's -0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSCX has outperformed LSFIX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while LSFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.60% annualized return.


LSSCX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.12%
6M
12.59%
YTD
20.28%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
9.82%
ALL TIME*
11.40%

LSFIX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.83%
6M
-0.83%
YTD
-0.42%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
3.60%
ALL TIME*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
20.28%5.31%10.89%19.39%-11.52%29.03%2.29%25.06%-16.81%10.01%
LSFIX
Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund
-0.42%9.10%5.39%8.21%-11.74%2.89%5.38%13.56%-3.07%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSCX and LSFIX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 1995

0.32

The correlation between LSSCX and LSFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSSCX vs. LSFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSSCX
LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LSFIX
LSFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LSFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LSFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSSCXLSFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

1.38

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

3.89

+5.01

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the LSFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSCX and LSFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, which is greater than LSFIX's maximum drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSCX and LSFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSSCXLSFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.28%

-26.33%

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-2.80%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-4.62%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-15.86%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.65%

-19.60%

-25.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-1.81%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-3.24%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

0.93%

+2.04%

Volatility

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) at 0.85%. This indicates that LSSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSSCXLSFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

0.85%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

2.70%

+9.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

3.43%

+13.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

4.95%

+15.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

4.91%

+17.43%

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSFIX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSSCX vs. LSFIX - Dividend Comparison

LSSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.55%, more than LSFIX's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSFIX
Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund
4.72%4.70%5.79%4.41%1.53%6.23%6.23%4.24%5.62%5.62%3.57%6.77%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
14.55%17.50%10.71%20.30%12.74%19.01%8.04%8.65%17.43%12.58%8.27%11.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSSCX and LSFIX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSCX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to LSFIX (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSCX dropped -54.28% vs LSFIX's -26.33%.

LSSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSSCX and LSFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer