PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMDX vs. SIVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) and State Street Institutional Small-Cap Equity Fund (SIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CSMDX having a 12.52% return and SIVIX slightly lower at 12.16%.


CSMDX

1D
1.36%
1M
1.48%
YTD
12.52%
6M
10.28%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*

SIVIX

1D
1.91%
1M
3.84%
YTD
12.16%
6M
9.63%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
12.52%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%10.44%
SIVIX
State Street Institutional Small-Cap Equity Fund
12.16%0.64%10.83%14.23%-14.99%21.48%15.19%26.69%-10.13%9.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMDX and SIVIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017

0.94

The correlation between CSMDX and SIVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSMDX vs. SIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVIX
SIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) and State Street Institutional Small-Cap Equity Fund (SIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSMDXSIVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.75

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

5.54

+0.20

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the SIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMDX and SIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMDX drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, smaller than the maximum SIVIX drawdown of -56.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMDX and SIVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMDXSIVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-56.52%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-10.92%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.60%

-25.67%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-26.51%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-8.81%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.45%

-0.45%

Volatility

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) is 4.29%, while State Street Institutional Small-Cap Equity Fund (SIVIX) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that CSMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSMDXSIVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

4.92%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

11.97%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

17.13%

-2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

20.33%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

21.13%

-1.98%

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSMDX vs. SIVIX - Dividend Comparison

CSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than SIVIX's 15.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.79%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%0.00%0.00%
SIVIX
State Street Institutional Small-Cap Equity Fund
15.68%17.59%10.99%7.77%4.87%16.56%3.16%6.27%19.92%9.35%3.38%13.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, CSMDX and SIVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SIVIX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to CSMDX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMDX dropped -37.28% vs SIVIX's -56.52%.

CSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSMDX and SIVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer