PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMDX vs. CAMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) and Cambiar Small Cap Fund (CAMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMDX achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than CAMSX's 19.05% return.


CSMDX

1D
1.36%
1M
1.48%
YTD
12.52%
6M
10.28%
1Y
17.42%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*

CAMSX

1D
2.03%
1M
3.19%
YTD
19.05%
6M
17.06%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
12.52%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%10.44%
CAMSX
Cambiar Small Cap Fund
19.05%8.91%6.01%12.12%-8.70%17.24%9.52%29.01%-12.51%3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMDX and CAMSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017

0.91

The correlation between CSMDX and CAMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSMDX vs. CAMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

CAMSX
CAMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CAMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) and Cambiar Small Cap Fund (CAMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSMDXCAMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.10

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

9.94

-4.20

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the CAMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMDX and CAMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMDX drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, smaller than the maximum CAMSX drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMDX and CAMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMDXCAMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-58.43%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-10.44%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.60%

-22.14%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.60%

-22.14%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.10%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-8.82%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.25%

-0.25%

Volatility

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) is 4.29%, while Cambiar Small Cap Fund (CAMSX) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that CSMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSMDXCAMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

5.66%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

12.35%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

16.94%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.20%

18.80%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.15%

20.78%

-1.63%

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CAMSX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSMDX vs. CAMSX - Dividend Comparison

CSMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than CAMSX's 8.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAMSX
Cambiar Small Cap Fund
8.90%10.60%3.52%1.35%0.48%32.84%0.34%4.82%24.24%4.61%0.00%8.66%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.79%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSMDX and CAMSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMSX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to CSMDX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMDX dropped -37.28% vs CAMSX's -58.43%.

CAMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSMDX and CAMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer