PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSSCX vs. LSHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSSCX achieves a 20.28% return, which is significantly higher than LSHIX's 2.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LSSCX has outperformed LSHIX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while LSHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.93% annualized return.


LSSCX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.12%
6M
12.59%
YTD
20.28%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
9.82%
ALL TIME*
11.40%

LSHIX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.17%
6M
1.21%
YTD
2.10%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
4.93%
ALL TIME*
5.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
20.28%5.31%10.89%19.39%-11.52%29.03%2.29%25.06%-16.81%10.01%
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
2.10%9.25%9.43%10.00%-11.68%8.23%3.46%10.55%-3.55%8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between LSSCX and LSHIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 1996

0.53

The correlation between LSSCX and LSHIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSSCX vs. LSHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSSCX
LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LSHIX
LSHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LSHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LSHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) and Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSSCXLSHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.01

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

14.05

-5.15

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the LSHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSSCX and LSHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.28%, which is greater than LSHIX's maximum drawdown of -40.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSSCX and LSHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSSCXLSHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.28%

-40.26%

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.89%

-2.25%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-4.75%

-20.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-15.18%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.65%

-24.13%

-20.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.34%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-7.24%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

0.45%

+2.52%

Volatility

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) at 0.63%. This indicates that LSSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSSCXLSHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

0.63%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

2.49%

+9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

3.35%

+13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.78%

5.40%

+15.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

6.06%

+16.28%

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSSCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSHIX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSSCX vs. LSHIX - Dividend Comparison

LSSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.55%, more than LSHIX's 5.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
5.65%5.77%7.72%6.28%4.96%6.09%5.14%6.75%7.52%5.97%6.06%10.99%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
14.55%17.50%10.71%20.30%12.74%19.01%8.04%8.65%17.43%12.58%8.27%11.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSSCX and LSHIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSCX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to LSHIX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSSCX dropped -54.28% vs LSHIX's -40.26%.

LSHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSSCX and LSHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer