CSL vs. EME
CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) and EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CSL in Building Products & Equipment, EME in Engineering & Construction. Over the past 10 years, CSL returned 14.74%/yr vs 34.03%/yr for EME. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSL vs. EME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than EME's 37.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 14.74%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 34.03% annualized return.
CSL
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 0.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 14.74%
EME
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -7.75%
- YTD
- 37.83%
- 6M
- 35.11%
- 1Y
- 76.58%
- 3Y*
- 69.04%
- 5Y*
- 46.78%
- 10Y*
- 34.03%
CSL vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 11.20% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 37.83% | 35.05% | 111.27% | 46.03% | 16.81% | 39.93% | 6.47% | 45.18% | -26.68% | 16.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSL and EME is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 1995 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CSL and EME shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.54 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSL:
$14.53B
EME:
$37.95B
CSL:
$17.08
EME:
$29.65
CSL:
20.70
EME:
28.41
CSL:
0.54
EME:
0.66
CSL:
3.02
EME:
2.14
CSL:
8.79
EME:
9.81
CSL:
$4.98B
EME:
$17.75B
CSL:
$1.41B
EME:
$3.47B
CSL:
$1.17B
EME:
$2.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSL vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank
CSL
EME
CSL vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSL | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.36 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 3.06 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | 7.53 | -7.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSL vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum EME drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and EME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSL | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -70.56% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.67% | -25.15% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -36.19% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -36.19% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | -48.00% | +9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.01% | -10.75% | -14.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -15.36% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.93% | 10.20% | +8.73% |
Volatility
CSL vs. EME - Volatility Comparison
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) have volatilities of 11.22% and 10.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSL | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 10.96% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.00% | 26.57% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.29% | 38.75% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.85% | 33.45% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.70% | 33.06% | -3.36% |
Dividends
CSL vs. EME - Dividend Comparison
CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than EME's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.67% |
Financials
CSL vs. EME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSL vs. EME - Profitability Comparison
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 863.95M and revenue of 4.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 180.30M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
EME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 403.85M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.7%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
EME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 305.48M and revenue of 4.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSL and EME have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSL has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to EME (10.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSL dropped -64.56% vs EME's -70.56%.
EME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSL and EME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer