CSL vs. BKNG
CSL (Carlisle Companies Incorporated) and BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. CSL operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while BKNG operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CSL returned 14.57%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for BKNG. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSL vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -22.63% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 14.57%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.
CSL
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- -5.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
BKNG
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- -22.63%
- 6M
- -21.85%
- 1Y
- -23.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
CSL vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 8.12% | -12.26% | 19.14% | 34.26% | -4.08% | 60.64% | -1.96% | 63.10% | -10.31% | 4.51% |
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | -22.63% | 8.59% | 41.31% | 76.02% | -16.00% | 7.72% | 8.45% | 19.24% | -0.88% | 18.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSL and BKNG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 1999 | 0.34 |
The correlation between CSL and BKNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSL:
$14.13B
BKNG:
$130.96B
CSL:
$17.08
BKNG:
$7.60
CSL:
20.13
BKNG:
21.71
CSL:
0.52
BKNG:
0.32
CSL:
2.93
BKNG:
4.82
CSL:
$4.98B
BKNG:
$27.69B
CSL:
$1.41B
BKNG:
$22.16B
CSL:
$1.17B
BKNG:
$9.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSL vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank
CSL
BKNG
CSL vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSL | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.89 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | -0.72 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | -1.36 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSL vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and BKNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSL | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -99.32% | +34.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.67% | -33.35% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.72% | -33.35% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -39.53% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.68% | -47.77% | +9.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.08% | -28.50% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -47.05% | +34.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.90% | 17.53% | +1.37% |
Volatility
CSL vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison
Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) at 6.54%. This indicates that CSL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSL | BKNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | 6.54% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.85% | 26.83% | -1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.22% | 31.94% | +4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.81% | 32.26% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 32.45% | -2.77% |
Dividends
CSL vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison
CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than BKNG's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKNG Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 1.28% | 1.31% | 1.00% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% |
Financials
CSL vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSL vs. BKNG - Profitability Comparison
CSL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BKNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CSL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 180.30M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
BKNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
CSL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
BKNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSL and BKNG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSL has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to BKNG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSL dropped -64.56% vs BKNG's -99.32%.
CSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSL and BKNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer