CSD vs. VFMV
CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. CSD is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSD returned 16.45%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for VFMV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
CSD vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 8.53% return.
CSD
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 39.67%
- 6M
- 39.98%
- 1Y
- 71.88%
- 3Y*
- 36.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 14.07%
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
CSD vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 39.67% | 21.58% | 27.61% | 23.77% | -15.04% | 13.01% | 10.79% | 20.61% | -19.85% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.53% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSD and VFMV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between CSD and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
CSD vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSD
VFMV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
CSD
VFMV
Technology
CSD
VFMV
Healthcare
CSD
VFMV
Basic Materials
CSD
VFMV
-
Communication Services
CSD
VFMV
Utilities
CSD
VFMV
Real Estate
CSD
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
CSD
VFMV
Financial Services
CSD
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
CSD
-
VFMV
Energy
CSD
-
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSD vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
CSD
VFMV
CSD vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSD | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.26 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.37 | 2.18 | +4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.98 | 8.57 | +16.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSD | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03 | 1.49 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.84 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.69 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
CSD vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSD | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -33.64% | -36.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -6.00% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.15% | -10.35% | -19.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.15% | -15.41% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.23% | -3.64% | -10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 1.53% | +1.36% |
Volatility
CSD vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSD | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 2.09% | +4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.29% | 6.30% | +11.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.87% | 8.80% | +15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 11.75% | +11.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 14.25% | +10.58% |
CSD vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSD vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.51% | 0.86% | 0.73% | 0.99% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.60% | 1.62% | 2.61% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSD and VFMV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSD has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, CSD leads with 16.45% vs 9.82% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CSD has performed better with a 16.45% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.13% for VFMV.
CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSD and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer