CSD vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSD (Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CSD is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSD returned 16.45%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

CSD vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSD achieves a 39.67% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 21.39% return.

CSD

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 8.22%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.98%
• 1Y: 71.88%
• 3Y*: 36.42%
• 5Y*: 16.45%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSD vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF	39.67%	21.58%	27.61%	23.77%	-15.04%	13.01%	22.32%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CSD and QQQM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.64

The correlation between CSD and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSD vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CSD	QQQM
Industrials	31.1%	2.8%
Technology	18.6%	53.8%
Healthcare	13.1%	4.2%
Basic Materials	11.1%	1.1%
Communication Services	9.0%	15.8%
Utilities	7.0%	1.4%
Real Estate	5.1%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	12.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

CSD vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSD

CSD Risk / Return Rank: 88
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSD vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSD	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	2.65	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	3.46	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.45	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.37	3.53	+2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.98	13.52	+11.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSD vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSD Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSD and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSD	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03	2.65	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.82	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.85	-0.41

Drawdowns

CSD vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSD drawdown since its inception was -70.47%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSD and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSD	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.47%	-35.04%	-35.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-11.96%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.15%	-22.70%	-7.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.15%	-35.04%	+4.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.23%	-8.25%	-5.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	3.11%	-0.22%

Volatility

CSD vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a higher volatility of 6.19% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that CSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSD	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	4.48%	+1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.29%	12.05%	+6.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.87%	15.91%	+7.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.26%	22.24%	+1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.83%	22.12%	+2.71%

CSD vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CSD vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

CSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSD Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.17%	0.51%	0.86%	0.73%	0.99%	1.08%	0.99%	0.60%	1.62%	2.61%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSD and QQQM in my portfolio?

CSD and QQQM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CSD or QQQM?

CSD has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSD dropped -70.47% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, CSD or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 16.45% for CSD. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CSD or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 16.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CSD or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CSD or QQQM?

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.11% for CSD.

What is the main difference between CSD and QQQM?

CSD is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CSD and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.