PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. OUSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 6.80% return.


CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%

OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.80%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and OUSM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.88

The correlation between CSB and OUSM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. OUSM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
OUSM

Financial Services

26.5%
21.1%

Utilities

22.0%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
19.3%

Energy

11.5%
0.3%

Industrials

8.5%
22.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.4%

Technology

1.2%
13.5%

Healthcare

0.4%
9.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

CSB
26.5%
OUSM
21.1%

Utilities

CSB
22.0%
OUSM
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.0%
OUSM
19.3%

Energy

CSB
11.5%
OUSM
0.3%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
OUSM
22.8%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.4%
OUSM
4.9%

Communication Services

CSB
3.6%
OUSM
3.8%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.4%
OUSM
1.4%

Technology

CSB
1.2%
OUSM
13.5%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
OUSM
9.2%

Real Estate

CSB

-

OUSM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSBOUSMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

0.83

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

1.34

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

1.19

+1.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.26

3.47

+3.78

CSB vs. OUSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the OUSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and OUSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSBOUSMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

0.83

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.46

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.48

-0.03

Drawdowns

CSB vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than OUSM's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and OUSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBOUSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-39.84%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-9.21%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-19.44%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-19.44%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-1.67%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-5.22%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.14%

-0.66%

Volatility

CSB vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBOUSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.66%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

9.25%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

13.15%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

16.30%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

18.94%

+2.37%

CSB vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than OUSM's 2.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and OUSM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSM has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs OUSM's -39.84%.

On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.07% for OUSM.

CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.48% for OUSM.

CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and OUSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer