CRWV vs. FIG

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) and FIG (Figma, Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CRWV in Software - Infrastructure, FIG in Software - Application. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRWV vs. FIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Figma, Inc (FIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 24.12% return, which is significantly higher than FIG's -43.51% return.

CRWV

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -11.61%
• 6M: 10.91%
• YTD: 24.12%
• 1Y: -29.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIG

• 1D: -5.17%
• 1M: 13.86%
• 6M: -43.45%
• YTD: -43.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWV vs. FIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.	24.12%	-30.40%
FIG Figma, Inc	-43.51%	-56.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWV and FIG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRWV : $48.49B FIG : $10.29B
EPS CRWV : -$3.27 FIG : -$2.88
PS Ratio CRWV : 6.95 FIG : 9.26
PB Ratio CRWV : 9.84 FIG : 7.58
Total Revenue (TTM) CRWV : $6.23B FIG : $1.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRWV : $4.32B FIG : $926.29M
EBITDA (TTM) CRWV : $1.89B FIG : -$1.43B

Return for Risk

CRWV vs. FIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWV

CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 28
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWV vs. FIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Figma, Inc (FIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRWV	FIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.01	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.63	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	—	—

Drawdowns

CRWV vs. FIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, smaller than the maximum FIG drawdown of -86.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and FIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWV	FIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.84%	-86.20%	+21.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.59%	-82.70%	+31.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.73%	-69.15%	+31.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRWV	FIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	95.02%	94.23%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	112.64%	94.23%	+18.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	112.64%	94.23%	+18.41%

Dividends

CRWV vs. FIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWV nor FIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRWV vs. FIG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreWeave, Inc. and Figma, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRWV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.

FIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 264.77M and revenue of 333.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.4%.

CRWV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

FIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -137.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.2%.

CRWV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -740.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of -35.6%.

FIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -142.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in a net margin of -42.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWV and FIG in my portfolio?

CRWV and FIG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.