FIG vs. MGC
FIG (Figma, Inc) is a stock, while MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. Over the past year, FIG returned -79.57% vs 23.77% for MGC. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FIG vs. MGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIG achieves a -33.32% return, which is significantly lower than MGC's 10.99% return.
FIG
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 16.78%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- -33.32%
- 1Y
- -79.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -70.41%
MGC
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | $471.29M | $516.74M | $473.71M |
| $21.42M | $23.07M | $28.62M |
FIG vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | -33.32% | -56.04% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 10.99% | 9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIG and MGC is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIG vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank
FIG
MGC
FIG vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figma, Inc (FIG) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIG | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.31 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 2.42 | -3.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 9.79 | -11.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIG vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIG drawdown since its inception was -86.20%, which is greater than MGC's maximum drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG and MGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIG | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.20% | -52.26% | -33.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.36% | -9.85% | -71.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.57% | -0.62% | -78.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.89% | -7.14% | -62.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.82% | 2.43% | +69.39% |
Volatility
FIG vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison
Figma, Inc (FIG) has a higher volatility of 22.88% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 4.33%. This indicates that FIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIG | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.88% | 4.33% | +18.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.19% | 10.84% | +48.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.57% | 13.55% | +73.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.74% | 17.45% | +76.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.74% | 18.26% | +75.48% |
Dividends
FIG vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison
FIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.91% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIG and MGC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIG has higher volatility (22.88%) compared to MGC (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIG dropped -86.20% vs MGC's -52.26%.
MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIG and MGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer