PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIG vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FIG vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Figma, Inc (FIG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIG vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FIG
Figma, Inc
-43.43%-67.65%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-6.48%4.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIG:

$10.80B

NVDA:

$4.26T

EPS

FIG:

-$2.64

NVDA:

$4.90

PS Ratio

FIG:

9.95

NVDA:

19.80

PB Ratio

FIG:

7.15

NVDA:

27.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIG:

$1.06B

NVDA:

$215.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIG:

$870.26M

NVDA:

$153.46B

EBITDA (TTM)

FIG:

-$1.25B

NVDA:

$144.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIG achieves a -43.43% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -6.48% return.


FIG

1D
4.86%
1M
-28.07%
YTD
-43.43%
6M
-59.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
5.59%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
-6.52%
1Y
60.95%
3Y*
84.54%
5Y*
66.14%
10Y*
69.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIG vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIG

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIG vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figma, Inc (FIG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FIG vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.05

0.61

-1.67

Correlation

The correlation between FIG and NVDA is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FIG vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

FIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIG
Figma, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

FIG vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIG drawdown since its inception was -83.48%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.48%

-89.72%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.67%

-15.76%

-66.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-36.40%

-27.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

Volatility

FIG vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIGNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

87.86%

41.44%

+46.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.86%

51.74%

+36.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.86%

49.85%

+38.01%

Financials

FIG vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Figma, Inc and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
303.78M
68.13B
(FIG) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FIG vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Figma, Inc and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
82.1%
75.0%
Portfolio components
FIG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 249.47M and revenue of 303.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 51.09B and revenue of 68.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.

FIG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -195.50M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -64.4%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 44.30B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.0%.

FIG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -226.56M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in a net margin of -74.6%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 42.96B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in a net margin of 63.1%.