FIG vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Figma, Inc (FIG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Performance
FIG vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIG vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | -43.43% | -67.65% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | -6.48% | 4.86% |
Fundamentals
FIG:
$10.80B
NVDA:
$4.26T
FIG:
-$2.64
NVDA:
$4.90
FIG:
9.95
NVDA:
19.80
FIG:
7.15
NVDA:
27.09
FIG:
$1.06B
NVDA:
$215.94B
FIG:
$870.26M
NVDA:
$153.46B
FIG:
-$1.25B
NVDA:
$144.55B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIG achieves a -43.43% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -6.48% return.
FIG
- 1D
- 4.86%
- 1M
- -28.07%
- YTD
- -43.43%
- 6M
- -59.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- 5.59%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- -6.48%
- 6M
- -6.52%
- 1Y
- 60.95%
- 3Y*
- 84.54%
- 5Y*
- 66.14%
- 10Y*
- 69.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIG vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
FIG
NVDA
FIG vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figma, Inc (FIG) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIG | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.05 | 0.61 | -1.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIG and NVDA is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIG vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
FIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
FIG vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIG drawdown since its inception was -83.48%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG and NVDA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIG | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.48% | -89.72% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.67% | -15.76% | -66.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.67% | -36.40% | -27.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.99% | — |
Volatility
FIG vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIG | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.86% | 41.44% | +46.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.86% | 51.74% | +36.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.86% | 49.85% | +38.01% |
Financials
FIG vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Figma, Inc and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIG vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
FIG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 249.47M and revenue of 303.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 51.09B and revenue of 68.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.
FIG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -195.50M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -64.4%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 44.30B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.0%.
FIG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -226.56M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in a net margin of -74.6%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 42.96B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in a net margin of 63.1%.