FIG vs. GAA
FIG (Figma, Inc) is a stock, while GAA (Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF) is Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Cambria. Over the past year, FIG returned -79.57% vs 18.80% for GAA. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FIG vs. GAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIG achieves a -33.32% return, which is significantly lower than GAA's 8.56% return.
FIG
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 16.78%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- -33.32%
- 1Y
- -79.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -70.41%
GAA
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 18.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | $471.29M | $516.74M | $473.71M |
| $221.78K | $178.12K | $220.71K |
FIG vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | -33.32% | -56.04% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 8.56% | 8.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIG and GAA is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIG vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank
FIG
GAA
FIG vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Figma, Inc (FIG) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIG | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.37 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 3.27 | -4.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 11.60 | -12.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIG vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIG drawdown since its inception was -86.20%, which is greater than GAA's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIG and GAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIG | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.20% | -26.57% | -59.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.36% | -5.78% | -75.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.57% | -1.42% | -78.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.89% | -3.82% | -66.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.82% | 1.62% | +70.20% |
Volatility
FIG vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison
Figma, Inc (FIG) has a higher volatility of 22.88% compared to Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) at 1.83%. This indicates that FIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIG | GAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.88% | 1.83% | +21.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.19% | 7.67% | +51.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.57% | 9.42% | +77.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.74% | 11.31% | +82.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.74% | 11.09% | +82.65% |
Dividends
FIG vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison
FIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIG Figma, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GAA Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF | 3.50% | 4.24% | 3.88% | 3.73% | 6.05% | 4.21% | 2.73% | 3.32% | 3.01% | 2.36% | 2.82% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIG and GAA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIG has higher volatility (22.88%) compared to GAA (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIG dropped -86.20% vs GAA's -26.57%.
GAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIG and GAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer