CRWG vs. SOFR

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRWG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while SOFR is a Multisector Bonds fund tracking the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. CRWG is actively managed, while SOFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SOFR.

Performance

CRWG vs. SOFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 68.19% return, which is significantly higher than SOFR's 1.66% return.

CRWG

• 1D: 4.37%
• 1M: 12.52%
• YTD: 68.19%
• 6M: 23.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOFR

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.66%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 3.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWG vs. SOFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	68.19%	-81.81%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	1.66%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWG and SOFR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

CRWG vs. SOFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SOFR

SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 98
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWG vs. SOFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRWG	SOFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.70	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	6.91	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	3.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	39.64	—

Drawdowns

CRWG vs. SOFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than SOFR's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and SOFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWG	SOFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.42%	-0.41%	-89.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.87%	0.00%	-74.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.77%	-0.03%	-68.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRWG	SOFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.56%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	189.51%	0.84%	+188.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	189.51%	0.83%	+188.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	189.51%	0.83%	+188.68%

CRWG vs. SOFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SOFR's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRWG vs. SOFR - Dividend Comparison

CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than SOFR's 3.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	4.40%	7.39%	0.00%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	3.94%	4.22%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWG and SOFR in my portfolio?

CRWG and SOFR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRWG or SOFR?

On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRWG or SOFR?

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRWG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRWG or SOFR?

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.94% for SOFR.

What is the main difference between CRWG and SOFR?

CRWG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOFR is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 0.20% for SOFR.