SOFR vs. AINP

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SOFR (Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF) and AINP (Allspring Income Plus ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. SOFR is passively managed, while AINP is actively managed. Over the past year, SOFR returned 3.78% vs 3.52% for AINP. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SOFR charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AINP.

Performance

SOFR vs. AINP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOFR achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly higher than AINP's 0.85% return.

SOFR

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 1.78%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.11%

AINP

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.93%
• 6M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 1Y: 3.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	$155.19K	$151.21K	$205.79K
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	$672.00K	$510.60K	$2.25M

SOFR vs. AINP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	2.06%	4.27%	0.36%
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	0.85%	7.53%	-1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SOFR and AINP is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	0.05

Return for Risk

SOFR vs. AINP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SOFR

SOFR Risk / Return Rank: 98
SOFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
SOFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SOFR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

AINP

AINP Risk / Return Rank: 53
AINP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
AINP Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
AINP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
AINP Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AINP Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SOFR vs. AINP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) and Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SOFR	AINP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.32	1.29	+3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.33	1.96	+4.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.99	1.24	+1.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.47	1.68	+7.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.96	6.49	+31.46

SOFR vs. AINP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOFR Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is higher than the AINP Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOFR and AINP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SOFR vs. AINP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOFR drawdown since its inception was -0.41%, smaller than the maximum AINP drawdown of -2.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOFR and AINP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SOFR	AINP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-2.61%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.41%	-2.51%	+2.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-1.05%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-0.46%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.10%	0.65%	-0.55%

Volatility

SOFR vs. AINP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF (SOFR) is 0.27%, while Allspring Income Plus ETF (AINP) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that SOFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AINP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SOFR	AINP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.27%	0.83%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.64%	2.58%	-1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89%	3.28%	-2.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.84%	3.58%	-2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.84%	3.58%	-2.74%

SOFR vs. AINP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOFR has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AINP's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SOFR vs. AINP - Dividend Comparison

SOFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than AINP's 5.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AINP Allspring Income Plus ETF	5.87%	5.03%	0.47%
SOFR Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF	3.83%	4.22%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SOFR and AINP in my portfolio?

SOFR and AINP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SOFR or AINP?

AINP has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to SOFR (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOFR dropped -0.41% vs AINP's -2.61%.

Which ETF is better, SOFR or AINP?

On 1-year performance, SOFR leads with 3.78% vs 3.52% for AINP. On fees, SOFR is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SOFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SOFR or AINP?

Over the 1-year period, SOFR has performed better with a 3.78% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SOFR or AINP?

SOFR is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AINP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SOFR or AINP?

AINP has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 3.83% for SOFR.

What is the main difference between SOFR and AINP?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SOFR and 0.36% for AINP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SOFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.