CRWG vs. BNKU
CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRWG is actively managed, while BNKU is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.
Performance
CRWG vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWG achieves a 46.05% return, which is significantly higher than BNKU's 8.32% return.
CRWG
- 1D
- -5.06%
- 1M
- -34.22%
- YTD
- 46.05%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNKU
- 1D
- 10.09%
- 1M
- 13.36%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 19.85%
- 1Y
- 107.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWG vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 46.05% | -83.24% |
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | 8.32% | 46.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWG and BNKU is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWG vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank
CRWG
BNKU
CRWG vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWG | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.59 | -1.02 |
Drawdowns
CRWG vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWG drawdown since its inception was -89.42%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWG and BNKU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWG | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.42% | -58.03% | -31.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -40.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.18% | -8.18% | -70.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.58% | -16.53% | -52.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.49% | — |
Volatility
CRWG vs. BNKU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWG | BNKU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.34% | 57.51% | +133.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 73.26% | +118.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.34% | 73.26% | +118.08% |
CRWG vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWG vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison
CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF | 5.06% | 7.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWG and BNKU have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKU.
CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.06%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRWG and 0.95% for BNKU.
Find the right allocation for CRWG and BNKU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer