CRUX vs. MLPR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - CRUX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Columbia, while MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%). CRUX is actively managed, while MLPR is passively managed. Their -0.40 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for MLPR.

Performance

CRUX vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRUX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.14%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

MLPR

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: 11.14%
• 6M: 25.11%
• YTD: 39.50%
• 1Y: 39.67%
• 3Y*: 31.28%
• 5Y*: 31.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 32.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	$4.96M	$11.06M	$8.56M
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	$34.92K	$44.03K	$37.73K

CRUX vs. MLPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	-0.73%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and MLPR is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026	-0.40

Return for Risk

CRUX vs. MLPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRUX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MLPR

MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 68
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRUX vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRUX	MLPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.25	—

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and MLPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRUX	MLPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-48.98%	+47.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-0.13%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.69%	-8.89%	+8.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRUX	MLPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	22.38%	-18.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.93%	29.11%	-25.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.93%	33.66%	-29.73%

CRUX vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRUX vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than MLPR's 8.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN	8.83%	10.85%	9.57%	10.08%	7.49%	10.69%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRUX and MLPR in my portfolio?

CRUX and MLPR have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRUX or MLPR?

On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRUX or MLPR?

CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRUX or MLPR?

MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 8.83%, compared with 1.41% for CRUX.

What is the main difference between CRUX and MLPR?

CRUX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while MLPR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Columbia and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.95% for MLPR.