CRTC vs. GXPT
CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRTC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
CRTC vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRTC achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 16.86% return.
CRTC
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRTC vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 4.11% | 6.45% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRTC and GXPT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRTC vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
CRTC
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRTC vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRTC | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRTC vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, roughly equal to the maximum GXPT drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRTC | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -18.74% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -8.72% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -5.04% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility
CRTC vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRTC | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.55% | 22.91% | -9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 22.91% | -7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 22.91% | -7.03% |
CRTC vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRTC vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than GXPT's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 0.91% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRTC and GXPT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CRTC.
CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.12% for GXPT.
CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CRTC and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for CRTC and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer