CRTC vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CRTC is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, CRTC returned 25.72% vs 230.14% for AIS. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRTC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

CRTC vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRTC achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 117.05% return.

CRTC

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 9.78%
• 6M: 10.59%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIS

• 1D: 4.29%
• 1M: 34.88%
• YTD: 117.05%
• 6M: 121.69%
• 1Y: 230.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRTC vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	9.78%	18.69%	-4.08%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	117.05%	58.35%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CRTC and AIS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.77

The correlation between CRTC and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRTC vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRTC	AIS
Technology	33.5%	84.6%
Communication Services	16.0%	-
Healthcare	14.1%	-
Industrials	14.1%	8.9%
Energy	7.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	-
Utilities	6.0%	3.2%
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-0.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

CRTC vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 58
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRTC vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRTC	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	6.44	-4.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	5.83	-3.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.81	-0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	15.04	-12.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.94	49.62	-38.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRTC vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRTC Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 6.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRTC and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRTC	AIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	6.44	-4.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.40	3.22	-1.83

Drawdowns

CRTC vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRTC drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRTC and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRTC	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-32.78%	+13.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-15.84%	+6.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	0.00%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-5.46%	+3.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	4.80%	-2.39%

Volatility

CRTC vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) is 2.91%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.18%. This indicates that CRTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRTC	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	16.18%	-13.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	29.97%	-20.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.72%	36.06%	-23.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	38.09%	-22.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	38.09%	-22.36%

CRTC vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRTC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRTC vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.98%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRTC and AIS in my portfolio?

CRTC and AIS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRTC or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (16.18%) compared to CRTC (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRTC dropped -19.07% vs AIS's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, CRTC or AIS?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 230.14% vs 25.72% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRTC or AIS?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 230.14% return vs 25.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRTC or AIS?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRTC or AIS?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between CRTC and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CRTC and 0.75% for AIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.44 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.