CRSH vs. SFYF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index. CRSH is actively managed, while SFYF is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -18.24% vs 43.96% for SFYF. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SFYF.

Performance

CRSH vs. SFYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than SFYF's 14.85% return.

CRSH

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -8.50%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: -18.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SFYF

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 8.95%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 43.96%
• 3Y*: 36.32%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. SFYF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	3.14%	-13.40%	-51.96%
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF	14.85%	30.00%	38.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and SFYF is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024	-0.72

The correlation between CRSH and SFYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.72 to -0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. SFYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 4
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SFYF

SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 63
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. SFYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRSH	SFYF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	2.36	-2.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	3.01	-3.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.40	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	2.91	-3.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	9.65	-10.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRSH vs. SFYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the SFYF Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and SFYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRSH	SFYF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	2.36	-2.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	0.61	-1.32

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. SFYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than SFYF's maximum drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and SFYF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	SFYF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-56.09%	-7.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	-15.18%	-18.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.42%	-1.68%	-57.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.11%	-16.58%	-26.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.14%	4.57%	+16.57%

Volatility

CRSH vs. SFYF - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) at 5.58%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	SFYF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.19%	5.58%	+4.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.66%	13.21%	+9.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.72%	18.74%	+17.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.50%	29.28%	+18.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.50%	30.68%	+16.82%

CRSH vs. SFYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYF's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. SFYF - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, more than SFYF's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	96.17%	138.78%	94.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.31%	1.71%	1.19%	0.26%	0.40%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and SFYF in my portfolio?

CRSH and SFYF have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or SFYF?

CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to SFYF (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs SFYF's -56.09%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or SFYF?

On 1-year performance, SFYF leads with 43.96% vs -18.24% for CRSH. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SFYF has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or SFYF?

Over the 1-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 43.96% return vs -18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or SFYF?

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or SFYF?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

What is the main difference between CRSH and SFYF?

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while SFYF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.29% for SFYF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.