CRSH vs. FBY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -6.97% vs -17.63% for FBY. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

CRSH vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than FBY's -13.50% return.

CRSH

• 1D: 4.79%
• 1M: 8.23%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 18.00%
• 1Y: -6.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBY

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -7.14%
• YTD: -13.50%
• 6M: -13.67%
• 1Y: -17.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	10.99%	-13.40%	-52.42%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-13.50%	1.98%	31.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and FBY is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024	-0.37

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 4
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSH	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	-0.60	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.04	-0.68	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.91	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	-0.60	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.32	-1.22	+0.90

CRSH vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the FBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and FBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than FBY's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and FBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-31.53%	-32.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	-29.50%	-3.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.33%	-25.66%	-30.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.40%	-8.09%	-35.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.68%	14.46%	+7.22%

Volatility

CRSH vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) have volatilities of 9.74% and 10.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	10.24%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.35%	23.30%	-0.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.27%	29.60%	+6.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.27%	28.65%	+18.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.27%	28.65%	+18.62%

CRSH vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRSH and FBY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

CRSH vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.11%, more than FBY's 57.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	83.11%	138.78%	94.25%	0.00%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	57.98%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and FBY in my portfolio?

CRSH and FBY have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or FBY?

FBY has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to CRSH (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs FBY's -31.53%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or FBY?

On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -6.97% vs -17.63% for FBY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 9.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or FBY?

Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -6.97% return vs -17.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or FBY?

CRSH and FBY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or FBY?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 83.11%, compared with 57.98% for FBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.