CROX vs. CF
CROX (Crocs, Inc.) and CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. CROX operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while CF operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CROX returned 28.24%/yr vs 17.90%/yr for CF. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CROX vs. CF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 45.83% return, which is significantly higher than CF's 42.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CROX has outperformed CF with an annualized return of 28.24%, while CF has yielded a comparatively lower 17.90% annualized return.
CROX
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 28.66%
- YTD
- 45.83%
- 6M
- 38.71%
- 1Y
- 20.31%
- 3Y*
- 2.80%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 28.24%
CF
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -12.41%
- YTD
- 42.89%
- 6M
- 39.56%
- 1Y
- 19.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 17.90%
CROX vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 45.83% | -21.92% | 17.26% | -13.85% | -15.43% | 104.63% | 49.58% | 61.24% | 105.54% | 84.26% |
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 42.89% | -7.17% | 10.08% | -4.75% | 22.29% | 87.18% | -15.76% | 12.73% | 5.13% | 40.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CROX and CF is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2006 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CROX and CF shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CROX:
$6.32B
CF:
$16.91B
CROX:
-$1.94
CF:
$11.08
CROX:
1.65
CF:
2.35
CROX:
4.43
CF:
2.05
CROX:
$4.02B
CF:
$7.41B
CROX:
$2.34B
CF:
$2.99B
CROX:
$297.04M
CF:
$2.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CROX vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank
CROX
CF
CROX vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CROX | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.11 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.77 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 1.35 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CROX vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than CF's maximum drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and CF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CROX | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.74% | -76.73% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.54% | -24.87% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.04% | -29.16% | -24.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.86% | -48.36% | -25.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.18% | -60.74% | -14.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.94% | -20.11% | -10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.29% | -24.92% | -36.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.16% | 14.29% | +4.87% |
Volatility
CROX vs. CF - Volatility Comparison
Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a higher volatility of 12.30% compared to CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) at 9.83%. This indicates that CROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CROX | CF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.30% | 9.83% | +2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.47% | 35.49% | -3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.96% | 42.20% | +10.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.19% | 38.23% | +16.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.00% | 40.30% | +15.70% |
Dividends
CROX vs. CF - Dividend Comparison
CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 1.83% | 2.59% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% |
CROX Crocs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CROX vs. CF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crocs, Inc. and CF Industries Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CROX vs. CF - Profitability Comparison
CROX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.95M and revenue of 921.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.8%.
CF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
CROX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported an operating income of 200.84M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
CF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
CROX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crocs, Inc. reported a net income of 137.56M and revenue of 921.46M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
CF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 615.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CROX and CF have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CROX has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to CF (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CROX dropped -98.74% vs CF's -76.73%.
CF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CROX and CF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer