PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CROX vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CROX vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CROX achieves a 45.83% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 2.46% return.


CROX

1D
-0.92%
1M
28.36%
YTD
45.83%
6M
38.71%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
2.80%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
28.24%

BOTZ

1D
-0.38%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.47%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CROX vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
45.83%-21.92%17.26%-13.85%-15.43%104.63%49.58%61.24%105.54%84.26%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
2.46%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CROX and BOTZ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between CROX and BOTZ has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CROX vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CROX
CROX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CROX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CROX vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crocs, Inc. (CROX) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CROXBOTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.14

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

0.99

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.06

3.26

-2.19

CROX vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CROX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CROX and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CROX vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CROX drawdown since its inception was -98.74%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CROX and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CROXBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.74%

-55.54%

-43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.54%

-19.34%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.04%

-29.02%

-25.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.86%

-55.54%

-18.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.94%

-10.83%

-20.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.29%

-18.29%

-43.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.16%

5.84%

+13.32%

Volatility

CROX vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

Crocs, Inc. (CROX) has a higher volatility of 12.30% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 8.89%. This indicates that CROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CROXBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.30%

8.89%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.47%

19.49%

+12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.96%

25.07%

+27.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.19%

26.90%

+28.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.00%

25.79%

+30.21%

Dividends

CROX vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

CROX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BOTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.64%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CROX and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CROX has higher volatility (12.30%) compared to BOTZ (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CROX dropped -98.74% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

BOTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CROX and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer