CRNT vs. CLSK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK).

Performance

CRNT vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRNT vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CRNT Ceragon Networks Ltd.	3.81%	-55.03%	116.20%	13.09%	-25.97%	-7.19%	32.38%	-44.44%	90.91%	-24.43%
CLSK CleanSpark, Inc.	-14.82%	9.88%	-16.50%	440.69%	-78.57%	-67.23%	442.99%	-73.90%	-15.98%	-30.29%

Fundamentals

EPS CRNT : -$0.02 CLSK : -$1.28
PS Ratio CRNT : 0.59 CLSK : 2.23
Total Revenue (TTM) CRNT : $338.73M CLSK : $785.19M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRNT : $114.28M CLSK : $256.57M
EBITDA (TTM) CRNT : $22.15M CLSK : $131.94M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRNT achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly higher than CLSK's -14.82% return. Over the past 10 years, CRNT has outperformed CLSK with an annualized return of 5.98%, while CLSK has yielded a comparatively lower -11.72% annualized return.

CRNT

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: 3.81%
• 6M: -4.39%
• 1Y: -7.63%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: -10.57%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

CLSK

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -18.29%
• YTD: -14.82%
• 6M: -40.92%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: 45.82%
• 5Y*: -17.81%
• 10Y*: -11.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRNT vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRNT

CRNT Risk / Return Rank: 33
CRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

CLSK

CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 50
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRNT vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRNT	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	0.16	-0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	0.92	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.10	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	0.44	-0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	0.83	-1.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRNT vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRNT and CLSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRNT	CLSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	0.16	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	-0.18	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	-0.06	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	-0.06	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between CRNT and CLSK is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRNT vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRNT nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRNT vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRNT drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRNT and CLSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRNT	CLSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.24%	-98.56%	+1.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.26%	-64.74%	+32.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.42%	-92.25%	+25.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.75%	-98.56%	+18.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.19%	-88.19%	-5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.09%	-69.28%	-15.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.31%	34.21%	-16.90%

Volatility

CRNT vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) is 15.22%, while CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a volatility of 21.41%. This indicates that CRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRNT	CLSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.22%	21.41%	-6.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.23%	70.96%	-37.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.32%	91.38%	-40.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.78%	101.40%	-50.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.09%	184.27%	-122.18%

Financials