CRNT vs. IONQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRNT (Ceragon Networks Ltd.) and IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — CRNT in Communication Equipment, IONQ in Computer Hardware. Over the past 5 years, CRNT returned -2.24%/yr vs 48.02%/yr for IONQ. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CRNT vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRNT achieves a 50.95% return, which is significantly lower than IONQ's 59.13% return.

CRNT

• 1D: 11.62%
• 1M: 26.80%
• YTD: 50.95%
• 6M: 63.40%
• 1Y: 35.47%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: -2.24%
• 10Y*: 6.18%

IONQ

• 1D: 3.06%
• 1M: 54.55%
• YTD: 59.13%
• 6M: 52.14%
• 1Y: 75.99%
• 3Y*: 97.84%
• 5Y*: 48.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRNT vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRNT Ceragon Networks Ltd.	50.95%	-55.03%	116.20%	13.09%	-25.97%	-11.64%
IONQ IonQ, Inc.	59.13%	7.42%	237.13%	259.13%	-79.34%	54.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CRNT and IONQ is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2021	0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRNT : $287.55M IONQ : $26.51B
EPS CRNT : -$0.03 IONQ : $0.86
PS Ratio CRNT : 0.86 IONQ : 122.65
PB Ratio CRNT : 1.68 IONQ : 5.33
Total Revenue (TTM) CRNT : $335.08M IONQ : $187.12M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRNT : $115.25M IONQ : $71.25M
EBITDA (TTM) CRNT : $21.22M IONQ : $405.86M

Return for Risk

CRNT vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRNT

CRNT Risk / Return Rank: 61
CRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

IONQ

IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRNT vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRNT	IONQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	0.84	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.75	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.19	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.14	+0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.29	2.09	+0.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRNT vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is comparable to the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRNT and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRNT	IONQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	0.84	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.48	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.43	-0.55

Drawdowns

CRNT vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRNT drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than IONQ's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRNT and IONQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRNT	IONQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.24%	-90.00%	-7.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.26%	-67.61%	+35.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.42%	-67.61%	+1.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.42%	-90.00%	+23.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.09%	-13.02%	-77.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.13%	-51.06%	-34.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.31%	36.90%	-19.59%

Volatility

CRNT vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) is 19.31%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 29.50%. This indicates that CRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRNT	IONQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.31%	29.50%	-10.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.14%	67.00%	-33.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.76%	91.47%	-40.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.19%	100.08%	-48.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.62%	97.42%	-35.80%

Dividends

CRNT vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRNT nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRNT and IONQ in my portfolio?

CRNT and IONQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRNT or IONQ?

IONQ has higher volatility (29.50%) compared to CRNT (19.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRNT dropped -97.24% vs IONQ's -90.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IONQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.