PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRNT vs. IONQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRNT vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRNT achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than IONQ's -13.42% return.


CRNT

1D
1.38%
1M
-9.09%
6M
-7.95%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
1.85%
3Y*
1.24%
5Y*
-10.73%
10Y*
-0.40%
ALL TIME*
-9.32%

IONQ

1D
6.61%
1M
-20.91%
6M
0.75%
YTD
-13.42%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
30.73%
5Y*
31.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.30M$1.56M$1.92M
$713.90M$720.75M$1.43B

CRNT vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CRNT
Ceragon Networks Ltd.
4.76%-55.03%116.20%13.09%-25.97%-7.19%
IONQ
IonQ, Inc.
-13.42%7.42%237.13%259.13%-79.34%50.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CRNT and IONQ is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021

0.33

The correlation between CRNT and IONQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRNT:

$199.97M

IONQ:

$14.50B

EPS

CRNT:

-$0.03

IONQ:

$0.80

PS Ratio

CRNT:

0.60

IONQ:

71.61

PB Ratio

CRNT:

1.16

IONQ:

2.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRNT:

$335.08M

IONQ:

$187.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRNT:

$115.25M

IONQ:

$71.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRNT:

$21.22M

IONQ:

$405.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRNT vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRNT
CRNT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IONQ
IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRNT vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRNTIONQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.08

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

0.03

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

0.05

+0.06

CRNT vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRNT and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRNT vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRNT drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than IONQ's maximum drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRNT and IONQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRNTIONQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.24%

-90.00%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.31%

-67.61%

+32.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.42%

-67.61%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.42%

-90.00%

+23.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.12%

-52.67%

-40.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.20%

-50.76%

-34.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.16%

40.90%

-22.74%

Volatility

CRNT vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) is 14.43%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 24.39%. This indicates that CRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRNTIONQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.43%

24.39%

-9.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.41%

69.27%

-30.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.57%

95.22%

-41.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.76%

101.49%

-49.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.58%

97.23%

-35.65%

Dividends

CRNT vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRNT nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRNT vs. IONQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ceragon Networks Ltd. and IonQ, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CRNT and IONQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IONQ has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to CRNT (14.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRNT dropped -97.24% vs IONQ's -90.00%.

CRNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRNT and IONQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer