CRNT vs. KULR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR).

Performance

CRNT vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRNT vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRNT Ceragon Networks Ltd.	3.81%	-55.03%	116.20%	13.09%	-25.97%	-7.19%	32.38%	-44.44%	-0.26%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	-31.76%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	87.76%	-2.00%	-42.31%	73.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CRNT : $201.50M KULR : $80.25M
EPS CRNT : -$0.02 KULR : -$1.57
PS Ratio CRNT : 0.59 KULR : 4.93
PB Ratio CRNT : 1.17 KULR : 0.66
Total Revenue (TTM) CRNT : $338.73M KULR : $16.17M
Gross Profit (TTM) CRNT : $114.28M KULR : $770.97K
EBITDA (TTM) CRNT : $22.15M KULR : -$60.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRNT achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly higher than KULR's -31.76% return.

CRNT

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -5.22%
• YTD: 3.81%
• 6M: -4.39%
• 1Y: -7.63%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: -10.57%
• 10Y*: 5.98%

KULR

• 1D: -14.77%
• 1M: -30.82%
• YTD: -31.76%
• 6M: -53.35%
• 1Y: -79.96%
• 3Y*: -33.98%
• 5Y*: -36.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRNT vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRNT

CRNT Risk / Return Rank: 33
CRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
CRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
CRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 7
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRNT vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRNT	KULR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	-0.82	+0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.15	-1.61	+1.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	0.82	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.22	-0.96	+0.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	-1.32	+0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRNT vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRNT Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRNT and KULR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRNT	KULR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	-0.82	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	-0.30	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	-0.16	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between CRNT and KULR is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRNT vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRNT nor KULR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRNT vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRNT drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, roughly equal to the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRNT and KULR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRNT	KULR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.24%	-97.23%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.26%	-84.32%	+52.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.42%	-96.86%	+30.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-79.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.19%	-94.74%	+1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-85.09%	-65.63%	-19.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.31%	61.48%	-44.17%

Volatility

CRNT vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) is 15.22%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 23.24%. This indicates that CRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRNT	KULR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.22%	23.24%	-8.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.23%	71.55%	-38.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.32%	97.46%	-46.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.78%	124.74%	-73.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.09%	126.51%	-64.42%

Financials