CRML vs. SARO
CRML (Critical Metals Corp) and SARO (StandardAero, Inc) are both stocks. CRML operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while SARO operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past year, CRML returned 165.00% vs -6.40% for SARO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRML vs. SARO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRML achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly higher than SARO's -2.62% return.
CRML
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -19.70%
- 6M
- -46.91%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 165.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARO
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- 6M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- -6.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRML vs. SARO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRML Critical Metals Corp | 14.55% | 2.21% | -1.88% |
SARO StandardAero, Inc | -2.62% | 15.83% | -20.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRML and SARO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
CRML:
$742.83M
SARO:
$9.29B
CRML:
$560.62K
SARO:
$6.25B
CRML:
$560.62K
SARO:
$943.70M
CRML:
-$47.47M
SARO:
$709.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRML vs. SARO — Risk / Return Rank
CRML
SARO
CRML vs. SARO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Critical Metals Corp (CRML) and StandardAero, Inc (SARO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRML | SARO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.99 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | -0.26 | +2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | -0.48 | +3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRML vs. SARO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRML drawdown since its inception was -93.91%, which is greater than SARO's maximum drawdown of -32.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRML and SARO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRML | SARO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.91% | -32.58% | -61.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.74% | -26.51% | -51.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.47% | -15.67% | -57.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.11% | -15.50% | -52.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.53% | 14.44% | +41.09% |
Volatility
CRML vs. SARO - Volatility Comparison
Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a higher volatility of 21.47% compared to StandardAero, Inc (SARO) at 12.21%. This indicates that CRML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRML | SARO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.47% | 12.21% | +9.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.74% | 28.42% | +65.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 160.11% | 34.81% | +125.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 182.79% | 37.08% | +145.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 182.79% | 37.08% | +145.71% |
Dividends
CRML vs. SARO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRML nor SARO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRML vs. SARO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Critical Metals Corp and StandardAero, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRML and SARO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRML has higher volatility (21.47%) compared to SARO (12.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRML dropped -93.91% vs SARO's -32.58%.
CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRML and SARO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer