CRMG vs. GUSH
CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRMG is actively managed, while GUSH is passively managed. Over the past year, CRMG returned -62.88% vs 74.35% for GUSH. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
CRMG vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -57.62% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 63.29% return.
CRMG
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- -57.62%
- 6M
- -56.45%
- 1Y
- -62.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- 63.29%
- 6M
- 40.03%
- 1Y
- 74.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- -37.79%
CRMG vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -57.62% | 3.69% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 63.29% | 30.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMG and GUSH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRMG vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
CRMG
GUSH
CRMG vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRMG | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.23 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 2.58 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 5.89 | -7.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRMG | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 1.34 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.44 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
CRMG vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and GUSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMG | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.38% | -99.98% | +25.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.91% | -28.94% | -41.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.99% | -99.80% | +30.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.92% | -92.92% | +55.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.28% | 12.67% | +28.61% |
Volatility
CRMG vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a higher volatility of 33.63% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 16.42%. This indicates that CRMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRMG | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.63% | 16.42% | +17.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.83% | 43.53% | +20.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.38% | 55.60% | +19.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.55% | 68.24% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.55% | 93.69% | -18.14% |
CRMG vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRMG vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.53% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRMG and GUSH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRMG has higher volatility (33.63%) compared to GUSH (16.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMG dropped -74.38% vs GUSH's -99.98%.
On 1-year performance, GUSH leads with 74.35% vs -62.88% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 16.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 74.35% return vs -62.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRMG and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer