CRMG vs. PLTG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRMG returned -54.14% vs -11.74% for PLTG. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CRMG vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -49.96% return, which is significantly lower than PLTG's -39.12% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -8.29%
• 1M: 15.68%
• YTD: -49.96%
• 6M: -37.29%
• 1Y: -54.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTG

• 1D: -10.19%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: -39.12%
• 6M: -35.96%
• 1Y: -11.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-49.96%	-14.78%
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	-39.12%	86.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and PLTG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 3
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

PLTG

PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 9
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRMG	PLTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	-0.12	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.90	0.55	-1.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.07	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	-0.17	-0.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	-0.30	-1.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRMG vs. PLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the PLTG Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMG and PLTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMG	PLTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.73	-0.12	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	0.12	-0.70

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, which is greater than PLTG's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and PLTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	PLTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.38%	-69.02%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.91%	-69.02%	-1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.39%	-58.63%	-4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.61%	-30.24%	-7.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.69%	39.94%	+0.75%

Volatility

CRMG vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) is 31.95%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a volatility of 33.74%. This indicates that CRMG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	PLTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.95%	33.74%	-1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.03%	76.63%	-13.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.67%	102.15%	-27.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.24%	105.39%	-30.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.24%	105.39%	-30.15%

CRMG vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRMG and PLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CRMG vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.79%.

Position	TTM	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF	29.79%	18.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and PLTG in my portfolio?

CRMG and PLTG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRMG or PLTG?

PLTG has higher volatility (33.74%) compared to CRMG (31.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMG dropped -74.38% vs PLTG's -69.02%.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or PLTG?

On 1-year performance, PLTG leads with -11.74% vs -54.14% for CRMG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, CRMG has been the lower-risk option at 31.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRMG or PLTG?

Over the 1-year period, PLTG has performed better with a -11.74% return vs -54.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or PLTG?

CRMG and PLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or PLTG?

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 29.79%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.