CRMG vs. BMNG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG).

CRMG and BMNG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRMG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Apr 4, 2025. BMNG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Oct 27, 2025.

Performance

CRMG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRMG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-54.27%	3.63%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-61.95%	-81.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -61.95% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -8.73%
• YTD: -54.27%
• 6M: -45.34%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -15.09%
• YTD: -61.95%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRMG and BMNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

CRMG

Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF

BMNG

Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMG	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.77	-0.47	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and BMNG is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRMG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMG nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -68.94%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -93.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.94%	-93.85%	+24.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.54%	-92.91%	+26.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.23%	-76.97%	+44.74%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.86%	214.47%	-145.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.86%	214.47%	-145.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.86%	214.47%	-145.61%