CRMG vs. BMNG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

CRMG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -55.22% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -75.13% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -10.50%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: -55.22%
• 6M: -45.71%
• 1Y: -59.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: -12.21%
• 1M: -48.30%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -85.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-55.22%	3.63%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-75.13%	-81.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and BMNG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRMG	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.11	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.46	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMG	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	-0.52	-0.12

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -74.38%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.38%	-95.36%	+20.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.23%	-95.36%	+28.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.71%	-81.38%	+43.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.33%	191.58%	-116.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.73%	191.58%	-115.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.73%	191.58%	-115.85%

CRMG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRMG and BMNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

CRMG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMG nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and BMNG in my portfolio?

CRMG and BMNG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or BMNG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or BMNG?

CRMG and BMNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or BMNG?

CRMG and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.