PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRM vs. PSQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRM vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRM achieves a -30.18% return, which is significantly lower than PSQ's -9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CRM has outperformed PSQ with an annualized return of 8.81%, while PSQ has yielded a comparatively lower -18.20% annualized return.


CRM

1D
1.83%
1M
12.74%
6M
-12.88%
YTD
-30.18%
1Y
-28.16%
3Y*
-5.84%
5Y*
-5.00%
10Y*
8.81%
ALL TIME*
19.35%

PSQ

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.59%
6M
-9.19%
YTD
-9.94%
1Y
-15.69%
3Y*
-15.05%
5Y*
-11.74%
10Y*
-18.20%
ALL TIME*
-16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.36B$2.15B$2.56B
$270.27M$217.80M$219.49M

CRM vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
-30.18%-20.25%27.76%98.46%-47.83%14.20%36.82%18.74%33.98%49.33%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
-9.94%-15.51%-15.68%-32.01%36.40%-24.84%-41.23%-27.49%-2.34%-24.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CRM and PSQ is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

-0.62

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CRM and PSQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.62 to -0.07, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRM vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRM
CRM Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRM Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PSQ
PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRM vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRMPSQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.88

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

-0.63

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-1.23

+0.03

CRM vs. PSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the PSQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRM and PSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRM vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRM drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, smaller than the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRM and PSQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMPSQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-98.26%

+27.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.33%

-24.83%

-18.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.67%

-49.65%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.67%

-60.91%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.67%

-87.66%

+28.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.34%

-98.12%

+48.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.37%

-74.15%

+57.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.55%

12.73%

+10.82%

Volatility

CRM vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) at 6.96%. This indicates that CRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMPSQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.40%

6.96%

+7.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.51%

16.03%

+17.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.11%

19.38%

+21.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.77%

22.93%

+14.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.70%

22.46%

+13.24%

Dividends

CRM vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison

CRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than PSQ's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
0.93%0.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSQ
ProShares Short QQQ
4.26%4.97%7.15%6.01%0.35%0.00%0.31%1.75%0.95%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRM and PSQ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRM has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to PSQ (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRM dropped -70.50% vs PSQ's -98.26%.

CRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRM and PSQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer