PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRE.L vs. TK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRE.L vs. TK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) and Teekay Corporation (TK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CRE.L is traded in GBp, while TK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRE.L achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than TK's 37.58% return.


CRE.L

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
10.97%
6M
26.80%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
1.28%
5Y*
2.66%
10Y*

TK

1D
-1.12%
1M
-6.74%
YTD
37.58%
6M
28.39%
1Y
66.20%
3Y*
50.04%
5Y*
43.44%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRE.L vs. TK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRE.L
Conduit Holdings Ltd
10.97%-9.04%5.36%16.46%6.86%-12.64%-0.39%
TK
Teekay Corporation
37.58%37.64%49.99%49.62%61.78%47.43%-15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CRE.L and TK is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.01

Fundamentals

EPS

CRE.L:

£1.42

TK:

$1.09

PE Ratio

CRE.L:

2.98

TK:

10.54

PS Ratio

CRE.L:

0.45

TK:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRE.L:

£1.49B

TK:

$977.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRE.L:

£1.49B

TK:

$207.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRE.L:

£320.30M

TK:

$331.56M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRE.L vs. TK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRE.L
CRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

TK
TK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TK Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRE.L vs. TK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) and Teekay Corporation (TK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRE.LTKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

3.48

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

9.25

-7.60

CRE.L vs. TK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the TK Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRE.L and TK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRE.LTKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.85

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

1.05

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.01

+0.11

Drawdowns

CRE.L vs. TK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRE.L drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, smaller than the maximum TK drawdown of -96.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRE.L and TK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRE.LTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.61%

-96.35%

+50.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.66%

-19.12%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.61%

-32.86%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.61%

-34.75%

-10.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.39%

-56.02%

+42.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-59.33%

+43.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.54%

7.18%

+3.36%

Volatility

CRE.L vs. TK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) is 6.81%, while Teekay Corporation (TK) has a volatility of 12.65%. This indicates that CRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRE.LTKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

12.65%

-5.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.68%

26.71%

-8.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.24%

35.91%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.76%

41.81%

-15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.95%

56.20%

-30.25%

Dividends

CRE.L vs. TK - Dividend Comparison

CRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than TK's 17.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRE.L
Conduit Holdings Ltd
6.15%6.88%5.85%6.00%6.26%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TK
Teekay Corporation
17.47%11.07%46.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.03%6.59%2.36%2.74%17.55%

Financials

CRE.L vs. TK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conduit Holdings Ltd and Teekay Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20212022202320242025
402.80M
257.70M
(CRE.L) Total Revenue
(TK) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CRE.L values in GBp, TK values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CRE.L and TK have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRE.L and TK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer