CRE.L vs. CEF.TO
CRE.L (Conduit Holdings Ltd) and CEF.TO (Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CRE.L in Insurance - Reinsurance, CEF.TO in Asset Management. Over the past 5 years, CRE.L returned 2.66%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for CEF.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRE.L is traded in GBp, while CEF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CEF.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRE.L achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than CEF.TO's 1.64% return.
CRE.L
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 26.80%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 1.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- —
CEF.TO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 56.06%
- 3Y*
- 32.25%
- 5Y*
- 19.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.69%
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRE.L Conduit Holdings Ltd | 10.97% | -9.04% | 5.36% | 16.46% | 6.86% | -12.64% | -0.39% |
CEF.TO Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 1.64% | 78.83% | 26.29% | 1.74% | 12.63% | -7.19% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRE.L and CEF.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
CRE.L:
£1.42
CEF.TO:
CA$17.80
CRE.L:
2.98
CEF.TO:
3.62
CRE.L:
0.45
CEF.TO:
7.63
CRE.L:
£1.49B
CEF.TO:
CA$1.93B
CRE.L:
£1.49B
CEF.TO:
CA$1.91B
CRE.L:
£320.30M
CEF.TO:
CA$4.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRE.L
CEF.TO
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRE.L | CEF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.31 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.30 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | 6.01 | -4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRE.L | CEF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 1.56 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.88 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.40 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRE.L drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, smaller than the maximum CEF.TO drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRE.L and CEF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRE.L | CEF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.61% | -59.46% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.66% | -24.48% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.61% | -24.48% | -21.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.61% | -24.48% | -21.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -19.83% | +6.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -23.52% | +8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.54% | 9.36% | +1.18% |
Volatility
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) is 6.81%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF.TO) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that CRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRE.L | CEF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 9.76% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.68% | 33.49% | -14.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.24% | 36.22% | -1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 22.51% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.95% | 21.76% | +4.19% |
Dividends
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, while CEF.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF.TO Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
CRE.L Conduit Holdings Ltd | 6.15% | 6.88% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRE.L vs. CEF.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Conduit Holdings Ltd and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRE.L and CEF.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRE.L and CEF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer