TK vs. NRG
TK (Teekay Corporation) and NRG (NRG Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. TK operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while NRG operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, TK returned 8.81%/yr vs 25.18%/yr for NRG. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TK vs. NRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TK achieves a 37.08% return, which is significantly higher than NRG's -15.48% return. Over the past 10 years, TK has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 8.81%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.18% annualized return.
TK
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- 37.08%
- 6M
- 29.07%
- 1Y
- 65.04%
- 3Y*
- 53.85%
- 5Y*
- 41.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
NRG
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -13.60%
- YTD
- -15.48%
- 6M
- -19.30%
- 1Y
- -15.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.27%
- 5Y*
- 35.21%
- 10Y*
- 25.18%
TK vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TK Teekay Corporation | 37.08% | 48.20% | 47.41% | 57.49% | 44.59% | 46.05% | -59.59% | 61.78% | -63.10% | 18.93% |
NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | -15.48% | 78.91% | 78.58% | 69.36% | -23.47% | 18.54% | -2.14% | 0.69% | 39.59% | 133.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TK and NRG is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2003 | 0.31 |
The correlation between TK and NRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TK:
$1.00B
NRG:
$27.82B
TK:
$1.09
NRG:
$1.21
TK:
10.54
NRG:
110.45
TK:
0.04
NRG:
1.66
TK:
1.01
NRG:
0.82
TK:
1.38
NRG:
6.59
TK:
$977.60M
NRG:
$32.38B
TK:
$207.39M
NRG:
$4.69B
TK:
$331.56M
NRG:
$2.57B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TK vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank
TK
NRG
TK vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teekay Corporation (TK) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TK | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.97 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | -0.49 | +4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | -1.26 | +11.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TK | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | -0.36 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.89 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.64 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.36 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
TK vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TK drawdown since its inception was -97.03%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TK and NRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TK | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.03% | -79.41% | -17.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.68% | -32.57% | +15.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.17% | -32.57% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.59% | -32.62% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.87% | -48.76% | -35.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.03% | -27.09% | -35.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.80% | -28.00% | -19.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.69% | 12.80% | -6.11% |
Volatility
TK vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teekay Corporation (TK) is 12.86%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that TK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TK | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.86% | 15.26% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.84% | 34.36% | -7.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.75% | 44.34% | -8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.86% | 39.93% | +1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.07% | 39.28% | +16.79% |
Dividends
TK vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison
TK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.47%, more than NRG's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | 1.37% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 2.92% | 4.40% | 3.02% | 3.20% | 0.30% | 0.30% | 0.42% | 1.92% | 4.93% |
TK Teekay Corporation | 17.47% | 11.07% | 46.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 6.59% | 2.36% | 2.74% | 17.55% |
Financials
TK vs. NRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teekay Corporation and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TK vs. NRG - Profitability Comparison
TK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teekay Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 257.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 10.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teekay Corporation reported an operating income of 109.66M and revenue of 257.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.6%.
NRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 328.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
TK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teekay Corporation reported a net income of 34.97M and revenue of 257.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
NRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NRG Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 125.00M and revenue of 10.26B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TK and NRG have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRG has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to TK (12.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TK dropped -97.03% vs NRG's -79.41%.
TK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TK and NRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer