PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TK vs. MATX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TK vs. MATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teekay Corporation (TK) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TK achieves a 37.08% return, which is significantly lower than MATX's 51.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TK has underperformed MATX with an annualized return of 8.81%, while MATX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.00% annualized return.


TK

1D
-1.38%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
37.08%
6M
29.07%
1Y
65.04%
3Y*
53.85%
5Y*
41.91%
10Y*
8.81%

MATX

1D
-0.67%
1M
8.98%
YTD
51.02%
6M
63.44%
1Y
65.56%
3Y*
38.38%
5Y*
25.84%
10Y*
21.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TK vs. MATX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TK
Teekay Corporation
37.08%48.20%47.41%57.49%44.59%46.05%-59.59%61.78%-63.10%18.93%
MATX
Matson, Inc.
51.02%-7.21%24.30%78.20%-29.53%60.35%43.05%30.32%9.78%-13.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TK and MATX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 1995

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TK:

$1.00B

MATX:

$5.69B

EPS

TK:

$1.09

MATX:

$13.63

PE Ratio

TK:

10.54

MATX:

13.63

PEG Ratio

TK:

0.04

MATX:

2.27

PS Ratio

TK:

1.01

MATX:

1.76

PB Ratio

TK:

1.38

MATX:

2.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

TK:

$977.60M

MATX:

$3.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TK:

$207.39M

MATX:

$610.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

TK:

$331.56M

MATX:

$712.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TK vs. MATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TK
TK Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TK Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MATX
MATX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TK vs. MATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teekay Corporation (TK) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TKMATXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

2.74

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.75

8.45

+1.29

TK vs. MATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TK Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the MATX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TK and MATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TKMATXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

1.83

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.65

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.50

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.25

-0.16

Drawdowns

TK vs. MATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TK drawdown since its inception was -97.03%, which is greater than MATX's maximum drawdown of -71.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TK and MATX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TKMATXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.03%

-71.40%

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.68%

-24.05%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.17%

-46.90%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.59%

-53.63%

+17.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.87%

-53.63%

-30.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.03%

-1.49%

-61.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.80%

-33.33%

-14.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

7.78%

-1.09%

Volatility

TK vs. MATX - Volatility Comparison

Teekay Corporation (TK) and Matson, Inc. (MATX) have volatilities of 12.86% and 12.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TKMATXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.86%

12.96%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.84%

24.89%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.75%

36.00%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.86%

39.74%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.07%

42.19%

+13.88%

Dividends

TK vs. MATX - Dividend Comparison

TK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.47%, more than MATX's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MATX
Matson, Inc.
0.77%1.13%0.98%1.15%1.95%1.18%1.58%2.11%2.56%2.61%2.09%1.64%
TK
Teekay Corporation
17.47%11.07%46.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.03%6.59%2.36%2.74%17.55%

Financials

TK vs. MATX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teekay Corporation and Matson, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
257.70M
757.80M
(TK) Total Revenue
(MATX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TK vs. MATX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teekay Corporation and Matson, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
TK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teekay Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 257.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MATX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 757.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teekay Corporation reported an operating income of 109.66M and revenue of 257.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.6%.

MATX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.40M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

TK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teekay Corporation reported a net income of 34.97M and revenue of 257.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

MATX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 56.60M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TK and MATX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MATX has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to TK (12.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TK dropped -97.03% vs MATX's -71.40%.

MATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TK and MATX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer