PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TK vs. MATX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TK vs. MATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teekay Corporation (TK) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TK achieves a 30.97% return, which is significantly lower than MATX's 81.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TK has underperformed MATX with an annualized return of 11.94%, while MATX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.51% annualized return.


TK

1D
-0.55%
1M
-9.66%
6M
22.05%
YTD
30.97%
1Y
57.48%
3Y*
46.47%
5Y*
47.10%
10Y*
11.94%

MATX

1D
7.01%
1M
14.05%
6M
53.79%
YTD
81.70%
1Y
102.96%
3Y*
42.66%
5Y*
29.58%
10Y*
22.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TK vs. MATX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TK
Teekay Corporation
30.97%48.20%47.41%57.49%44.59%46.05%-59.59%61.78%-63.10%18.93%
MATX
Matson, Inc.
81.70%-7.21%24.30%78.20%-29.53%60.35%43.05%30.32%9.78%-13.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TK and MATX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 1995

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TK:

$951.91M

MATX:

$6.77B

EPS

TK:

$0.81

MATX:

$13.77

PE Ratio

TK:

13.56

MATX:

16.24

PEG Ratio

TK:

0.06

MATX:

2.71

PS Ratio

TK:

0.94

MATX:

2.10

PB Ratio

TK:

0.44

MATX:

2.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

TK:

$1.00B

MATX:

$3.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TK:

$239.59M

MATX:

$610.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

TK:

$388.35M

MATX:

$712.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TK vs. MATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TK
TK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TK Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MATX
MATX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TK vs. MATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teekay Corporation (TK) and Matson, Inc. (MATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TKMATXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

4.62

-2.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

15.36

-8.04

TK vs. MATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TK Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the MATX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TK and MATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TK vs. MATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TK drawdown since its inception was -97.03%, which is greater than MATX's maximum drawdown of -71.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TK and MATX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TKMATXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.03%

-71.40%

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.83%

-22.40%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.17%

-46.90%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.17%

-53.63%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.87%

-53.63%

-30.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.68%

0.00%

-64.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.85%

-33.26%

-14.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.88%

6.73%

+1.15%

Volatility

TK vs. MATX - Volatility Comparison

Teekay Corporation (TK) has a higher volatility of 14.06% compared to Matson, Inc. (MATX) at 10.96%. This indicates that TK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TKMATXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.06%

10.96%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.50%

26.48%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.64%

37.05%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.64%

39.75%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.54%

42.25%

+13.29%

Dividends

TK vs. MATX - Dividend Comparison

TK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than MATX's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MATX
Matson, Inc.
0.64%1.13%0.98%1.15%1.95%1.18%1.58%2.11%2.56%2.61%2.09%1.64%
TK
Teekay Corporation
9.14%11.07%46.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.03%6.59%2.36%2.74%17.55%

Financials

TK vs. MATX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Teekay Corporation and Matson, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
285.82M
757.80M
(TK) Total Revenue
(MATX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TK vs. MATX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Teekay Corporation and Matson, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
55.1%
0
Portfolio components
TK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Teekay Corporation reported a gross profit of 157.58M and revenue of 285.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.1%.

MATX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 757.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Teekay Corporation reported an operating income of 147.21M and revenue of 285.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.5%.

MATX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matson, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.40M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

TK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Teekay Corporation reported a net income of 47.68M and revenue of 285.82M, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

MATX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Matson, Inc. reported a net income of 56.60M and revenue of 757.80M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TK and MATX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TK has higher volatility (14.06%) compared to MATX (10.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TK dropped -97.03% vs MATX's -71.40%.

MATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TK and MATX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer