CRE.L vs. SPY
CRE.L (Conduit Holdings Ltd) is a stock, while SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, CRE.L returned 2.66%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for SPY. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRE.L vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRE.L is traded in GBp, while SPY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRE.L achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 11.74% return.
CRE.L
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 26.80%
- 1Y
- 17.44%
- 3Y*
- 1.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 29.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.14%
- 10Y*
- 16.44%
CRE.L vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRE.L Conduit Holdings Ltd | 10.97% | -9.04% | 5.36% | 16.46% | 6.86% | -12.64% | -0.39% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 11.32% | 9.33% | 27.07% | 19.87% | -8.45% | 29.95% | 0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRE.L and SPY is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRE.L vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
CRE.L
SPY
CRE.L vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRE.L | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.48 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 3.84 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | 14.68 | -13.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRE.L | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 2.57 | -2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.95 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.69 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
CRE.L vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRE.L drawdown since its inception was -45.61%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRE.L and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRE.L | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.61% | -34.68% | -10.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.66% | -7.69% | -19.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.61% | -21.94% | -23.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.61% | -21.94% | -23.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | 0.00% | -13.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -4.77% | -10.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.54% | 2.01% | +8.53% |
Volatility
CRE.L vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.53%. This indicates that CRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRE.L | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 2.53% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.68% | 8.13% | +10.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.24% | 11.48% | +22.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.76% | 16.02% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.95% | 18.02% | +7.93% |
Dividends
CRE.L vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
CRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRE.L Conduit Holdings Ltd | 6.15% | 6.88% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRE.L and SPY have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRE.L and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer